Skip to main content
CaralogyCaralogy
HomeBrandsRoad TripBudgetDuelGuides
Caralogy

The car comparison platform. Physics simulation, road trips, real costs.

Navigation
All brandsCar duelRunning costsMotorwayMethodology
Simulators
Motorway simulatorRunning costsPerformance duel
Brands
VolkswagenBMWMercedesToyotaTeslaAudi
FRENDEESIT
© 2026 Caralogy · All rights reserved
  1. Home
  2. /Motorway
  3. /compact SUV
AX1vsBE-PACEPetrol
  • MotorwayMotorwayRange and charging
  • PerformancePerformance0-100, top speed
  • ConsumptionConsumptionYearly cost
  • SpecsX1 · E-PACE

BMW X1 xDrive25i F48 vs Jaguar E-PACE P200

Trip mapped at a glance. Charging stops visible, total duration predictable. Caralogy simulation at 130 km/h.

compact SUV · 2019 vs 2018 · Paris → Marseille · 775 km · 130 km/h
BMWPetrolPlus rapide

X1 xDrive25i F48

231 ch · 2019

VS
JaguarPetrol

E-PACE P200

200 ch · 2018

Simulation trip
Assumptions: 130 km/h · start réservoir plein · mild weather

Result · total trip time

ABMW X1 xDrive25i F48

7h01no stop

0 stops · 102.59 €

Gap5 minin favour of X1 xDrive25i
BJaguar E-PACE P200

7h06charging included

1 stop · 161.87 €

Paris → Marseille · 130 km/h · Caralogy simulation
MeasureX1 xDrive25i F48E-PACE P200Gap
Total time7h017h065 min · X1 xDrive25i F48
Charging stops0 stops1 stop1 stop · X1 xDrive25i F48
Cost of energy used102.59 €161.87 €59.28 € · X1 xDrive25i F48

Visualise the trip

Both vehicles drive at 130 km/h. The difference comes from charging stops.

BMWPetrolFastest
X1 xDrive25i F48
100%
1000 km
Range
Paris
0 km · departure
Marseille
775 km · Arrival 7h01
0
Stops
7h01
Duration
102.59 €
Cost of energy used
JaguarPetrol
E-PACE P200
100%
636 km
Range
Paris
0 km · departure
Refuel 1
5 min · +61 L · 132.80 €
Marseille
775 km · Arrival 7h06
1
Stops
7h06
Duration
161.87 €
Cost of energy used

The 5-minute lead of the X1 xDrive25i F48 does not come from driving speed, but from one fewer charging stop on this route (0 vs 1).

Both vehicles drove at 130 km/h for the entire trip. The gap is built at the stops: no stop for the X1 xDrive25i F48 versus 1 stop of 5 min for the E-PACE P200.

Motorway consumption: the Caralogy methodology

The official WLTP figures (6,8 L/100km for X1 xDrive25i F48 and 7,7 L/100km for E-PACE P200) are measured on a mixed cycle averaging ~46 km/h. At a steady 130 km/h, aerodynamic drag weighs much more heavily - it grows with the square of speed. Caralogy calculates a motorway consumption specific to each vehicle based on its aerodynamic profile (SCx), weight and power curve - not a uniform correction factor. For this trip, the simulation yields 6,1 L/100km (X1 xDrive25i F48) and 9,6 L/100km (E-PACE P200). Full methodology: see the assumptions below the controls.

Energy cost breakdown for your trip Paris → Marseille

The cost per kilometre depends on the electricity rate applied to each segment - based on the energy source used at that point of the trip.

BMW X1 xDrive25i F48

SegmentEnergy usedDistanceConsumption€/kmCost (€)
Paris → Marseillefuel · 2.17 €/L775 km47 L consumed0.132 €/km102.59 €
Trip total102.59 €

Jaguar E-PACE P200

SegmentEnergy usedDistanceConsumption€/kmCost (€)
Paris → Montélimar, A7fuel · 2.17 €/L636 km61 L consumed0.209 €/km132.80 €
Montélimar, A7 → Marseillefuel · 2.17 €/L139 km13 L consumed0.209 €/km29.06 €
Trip total161.87 €

What produces these figures

WLTP combined consumption
6.8 L/100 km · 7.7 L/100 km
Fuel tank
61 L · 68 L

Compare with another vehicle

Replace one of the two with an alternative from the same segment

BMWPetrol

X1 xDrive25i F48

231 ch · 2019

JaguarPetrol

E-PACE P200

200 ch · 2018

Other duels you might be interested in

BMWVSAudi

X1 xDrive25i vs Q3 Sportback TFSI quattro S tronic 150 kW

JaguarVSVolvo

E-PACE P200 vs XC40 B4

BMWVSAudi

X1 xDrive25i vs Q3 SUV

AudiVSJaguar

Q3 Sportback TFSI quattro S tronic 150 kW vs E-PACE P200

Frequently asked questions

On Paris → Marseille (775 km at 130 km/h), the X1 xDrive25i F48 arrives in 7h01 with 0 fuel stops.

WLTP consumption does not reflect motorway reality. Aerodynamic drag grows with the square of speed, so real consumption is 15 to 25 % higher than WLTP combined. Caralogy calculates a highway consumption specific to each vehicle based on its aerodynamic profile (SCx), weight and power curve.

Total time = driving time + charging time. Driving time is calculated at an average speed of 130 km/h on the motorway (adjustable). Charging time is calculated based on the real power curve of each vehicle, respecting the optimal 10 → 80 % range and the maximum power accepted by the chargers on the route.

No. The displayed cost covers only the energy consumed during the trip: kWh × energy rate, with a mix of home charging and DC fast chargers. Battery wear is a long-term ownership cost, not a trip cost.

On this trip, the energy used costs 102.59 € (X1 xDrive25i F48) and 161.87 € (E-PACE P200). For reference, an equivalent Peugeot 3008 1.2 PureTech 130 (~7.8 L/100 km) would cost about 112 € in fuel.