F48 · GENERATION 2019 · COMPACT SUV
BMWICE

X1 xDrive25i

231 hp, 6,6 s 0-100 : among the 40 C-SUV 2017–2021, the X1 xDrive25i ranks 33th of 40 in Combined consumption, 25th of 37 in Tank range, 4th of 40 in 0–100 km/h. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.

Energy cost · estimate2,06015,000 km · UK mix · home 0,21 £/kWhConsumption →

Power

231hp

350 Nm

0 → 100 km/h

6.6s

VMax 235 km/h

Cons.

6.8L

/100 km

Tank

61L

Technical identity card

Full specifications BMW X1 xDrive25i

Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.

Powertrain

Architecture4 cyl.
Displacement1,998 cm³
Power231 hp
Couple350 Nm
GearboxConvertisseur de couple 8 rapports Automatique
TransmissionIntegrale (AWD)

Consumption

Cons. WLTP6.8 L/100km
Tank61 L

Performance

0 → 100 km/h6,6 s
VMax235 km/h

Dimensions and environment

Length4,439 mm
Wheelbase2,670 mm
Width1,821 mm
Height1,598 mm
Boot505 L
Kerb weight1,580 kg
Cd0.28
CO₂ WLTP155 g/km

Caralogy Methodology

Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.

See full methodology →

Manufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance

Among the 40 C-SUV, the X1 xDrive25i ranks (in the bottom third) in fuel consumption. Caralogy simulates its real-world cost: motorway simulation, consumption simulation and performance simulation.

Caralogy Analysis

Tailored to this vehicle?

Caralogy Verdict
Suitable for

C-SUV among the best in segment: 4th of 40 in 0–100 km/h (6.6 s).

Less suitable for

Some metrics lag behind the segment. Check the rankings above to identify weak points.

Alternatives to consider

If the priority is Combined consumption, the Bmw X1 xDrive18d (1st with 4.3 L/100) takes the lead. If the priority is Tank range, the Bmw X1 xDrive18d (1st with 1419 km) takes the lead.

Fuel consumption: 6.8 L/100 L/100 (33th of 40 in Combined consumption)

The X1 xDrive25i consumes 6.8 L/100 on the WLTP combined cycle. The segment reference is the Bmw X1 xDrive18d (4.3 L/100).

Tank range: 897 km (25th of 37 in Tank range)

On a full tank, the X1 xDrive25i covers 897 km on the combined cycle. The segment reference reaches 1419 km.

Segment positioning

Where the X1 xDrive25i stands against C-SUV

Comparison across 40 C-SUV marketed between 2017–2021.

Combined consumption33e / 40
6.8 L/100
Min 8.6 L/100 · Cupra Formentor VZMax 4.3 L/100 · Bmw X1 xDrive18d
Tank range25e / 37
897 km
Min 724 km · MG MG HS 1.5T AT FWDMax 1 419 km · Bmw X1 xDrive18d
0–100 km/h4e / 40
6,6 s
Min 10,8 s · Peugeot 3008 BlueHDi 130 EAT8Max 4,9 s · Cupra Formentor VZ

Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)

Cross-energy alternatives

Same needs, different powertrain.

Model family

The full BMW X1 F48 range

Generation F48 launched in 2015. Available versions sorted by energy.

Other versions of the F48

Compare

Popular duels involving the X1 xDrive25i

Frequently asked questions

BMW X1 xDrive25i: what you need to know

Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.

Among the 40 C-SUV 2017–2021, the X1 xDrive25i ranks 33th of 40 in Combined consumption (6.8 L/100, behind the Bmw X1 xDrive18d), 25th of 37 in Tank range (897 km, behind the Bmw X1 xDrive18d), 4th of 40 in 0–100 km/h (6.6 s, behind the Cupra Formentor VZ).

897 km on a full tank (6.8 L/100 on the combined cycle) - 25th of 37 in autonomie du segment.

Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.

The Bmw X1 xDrive18d leads in Combined consumption (4.3 L/100 vs 6.8 L/100). The choice depends on your priorities: check the X1 xDrive25i vs Bmw X1 xDrive18d duel for a detailed comparison.

Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.