Skip to main content
CaralogyCaralogy
HomeBrandsRoad TripBudgetDuelGuides
Caralogy

The car comparison platform. Physics simulation, road trips, real costs.

Navigation
All brandsCar duelRunning costsMotorwayMethodology
Simulators
Motorway simulatorRunning costsPerformance duel
Brands
VolkswagenBMWMercedesToyotaTeslaAudi
FRENDEESIT
© 2026 Caralogy · All rights reserved
  1. Home
  2. /Motorway
  3. /compact SUV
AX2vsBKugaPetrol
  • MotorwayMotorwayRange and charging
  • PerformancePerformance0-100, top speed
  • ConsumptionConsumptionYearly cost
  • SpecsX2 · Kuga

BMW X2 M35i F39 vs Ford Kuga EcoBoost 150

Trip mapped at a glance. Charging stops visible, total duration predictable. Caralogy simulation at 130 km/h.

compact SUV · 2019 vs 2020 · Paris → Marseille · 775 km · 130 km/h
BMWPetrol

X2 M35i F39

306 ch · 2019

VS
FordPetrol

Kuga EcoBoost 150

150 ch · 2020

Simulation trip
Assumptions: 130 km/h · start réservoir plein · mild weather

Result · total trip time

ABMW X2 M35i F39

7h01no stop

0 stops · 102.59 €

GapLess than a minute apart
BFord Kuga EcoBoost 150

7h01no stop

0 stops · 94.18 €

Paris → Marseille · 130 km/h · Caralogy simulation
MeasureX2 M35i F39Kuga EcoBoost 150Gap
Total time7h017h01Less than a minute apart
Charging stops0 stops0 stopsSame
Cost of energy used102.59 €94.18 €8.41 € · Kuga EcoBoost 150

Visualise the trip

Both vehicles drive at 130 km/h. The difference comes from charging stops.

BMWPetrol
X2 M35i F39
100%
1000 km
Range
Paris
0 km · departure
Marseille
775 km · Arrival 7h01
0
Stops
7h01
Duration
102.59 €
Cost of energy used
FordPetrol
Kuga EcoBoost 150
100%
964 km
Range
Paris
0 km · departure
Marseille
775 km · Arrival 7h01
0
Stops
7h01
Duration
94.18 €
Cost of energy used

Very close result: less than one minute apart on this route. Both vehicles are evenly matched on the motorway over this distance.

Both vehicles drove at 130 km/h for the entire trip. The gap is built at the stops: no stop for the X2 M35i F39 versus no stop for the Kuga EcoBoost 150.

Motorway consumption: the Caralogy methodology

The official WLTP figures (7,1 L/100km for X2 M35i F39 and 6,6 L/100km for Kuga EcoBoost 150) are measured on a mixed cycle averaging ~46 km/h. At a steady 130 km/h, aerodynamic drag weighs much more heavily - it grows with the square of speed. Caralogy calculates a motorway consumption specific to each vehicle based on its aerodynamic profile (SCx), weight and power curve - not a uniform correction factor. For this trip, the simulation yields 6,1 L/100km (X2 M35i F39) and 5,6 L/100km (Kuga EcoBoost 150). Full methodology: see the assumptions below the controls.

Energy cost breakdown for your trip Paris → Marseille

The cost per kilometre depends on the electricity rate applied to each segment - based on the energy source used at that point of the trip.

BMW X2 M35i F39

SegmentEnergy usedDistanceConsumption€/kmCost (€)
Paris → Marseillefuel · 2.17 €/L775 km47 L consumed0.132 €/km102.59 €
Trip total102.59 €

Ford Kuga EcoBoost 150

SegmentEnergy usedDistanceConsumption€/kmCost (€)
Paris → Marseillefuel · 2.17 €/L775 km43 L consumed0.122 €/km94.18 €
Trip total94.18 €

What produces these figures

WLTP combined consumption
7.1 L/100 km · 6.6 L/100 km
Fuel tank
61 L · 54 L

Compare with another vehicle

Replace one of the two with an alternative from the same segment

BMWPetrol

X2 M35i F39

306 ch · 2019

FordPetrol

Kuga EcoBoost 150

150 ch · 2020

Other duels you might be interested in

AudiVSFord

Q3 Sportback vs Kuga EcoBoost 150

AudiVSFord

Q3 SUV vs Kuga EcoBoost 150

FordVSBMW

Kuga EcoBoost 150 vs X1 sDrive18i

FordVSBMW

Kuga EcoBoost 150 vs X2 sDrive18i

Frequently asked questions

On Paris → Marseille (775 km at 130 km/h), the X2 M35i F39 arrives in 7h01 with 0 fuel stops.

WLTP consumption does not reflect motorway reality. Aerodynamic drag grows with the square of speed, so real consumption is 15 to 25 % higher than WLTP combined. Caralogy calculates a highway consumption specific to each vehicle based on its aerodynamic profile (SCx), weight and power curve.

Total time = driving time + charging time. Driving time is calculated at an average speed of 130 km/h on the motorway (adjustable). Charging time is calculated based on the real power curve of each vehicle, respecting the optimal 10 → 80 % range and the maximum power accepted by the chargers on the route.

No. The displayed cost covers only the energy consumed during the trip: kWh × energy rate, with a mix of home charging and DC fast chargers. Battery wear is a long-term ownership cost, not a trip cost.

On this trip, the energy used costs 102.59 € (X2 M35i F39) and 94.18 € (Kuga EcoBoost 150). For reference, an equivalent Peugeot 3008 1.2 PureTech 130 (~7.8 L/100 km) would cost about 112 € in fuel.