Among the 44 C-SUV 2018–2022, the Kuga EcoBoost 150 ranks 32th of 44 in Combined consumption (6.6 L/100, behind the Bmw X1 xDrive18d), 37th of 40 in Tank range (818 km, behind the Bmw X1 xDrive18d), 41th of 44 in 0–100 km/h (9.8 s, behind the Cupra Formentor VZ).
III · GENERATION 2020 → · COMPACT SUV
FordICE
Kuga EcoBoost 150
150 hp, 9,8 s 0-100 : among the 44 C-SUV 2018–2022, the Kuga EcoBoost 150 ranks 32th of 44 in Combined consumption, 37th of 40 in Tank range, 41th of 44 in 0–100 km/h. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.
Power
150hp
240 Nm
0 → 100 km/h
9.8s
VMax 198 km/h
Cons.
6.6L
/100 km
Tank
54L
Technical identity card
Full specifications Ford Kuga EcoBoost 150
Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.
Powertrain
| Power | 150 hp |
| Couple | 240 Nm |
| Gearbox | Manuelle 6 rapports Manuelle |
Consumption
| Cons. WLTP | 6.6 L/100km |
| Tank | 54 L |
Performance
| 0 → 100 km/h | 9,8 s |
| VMax | 198 km/h |
Dimensions and environment
| Width | 1,882 mm |
| Height | 1,684 mm |
| Kerb weight | 1,607 kg |
| Cd | 0.33 |
Caralogy Methodology
Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.
See full methodology →Manufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance
Among the 44 C-SUV, the Kuga EcoBoost 150 ranks (in the bottom third) in fuel consumption. Caralogy simulates its real-world cost: motorway simulation, consumption simulation and performance simulation.
Caralogy Analysis
Tailored to this vehicle?
Fuel consumption: 6.6 L/100 L/100 (32th of 44 in Combined consumption)
The Kuga EcoBoost 150 consumes 6.6 L/100 on the WLTP combined cycle. The segment reference is the Bmw X1 xDrive18d (4.3 L/100).
Tank range: 818 km (37th of 40 in Tank range)
On a full tank, the Kuga EcoBoost 150 covers 818 km on the combined cycle. The segment reference reaches 1419 km.
Go beyond this analysis
Recalculate everything for your own profile with the three physics simulators that power this page.
Running cost for your profile
Adjust mileage, driving mix and charging type to estimate your annual energy budget.
Launch simulator →Long-distance trip
Simulate any motorway trip: time, charging stops, total cost.
Simulate a trip →Chronos & accélération
0-100, 0-200, courbe de vitesse, positionnement segment.
Voir la performance →Segment positioning
Where the Kuga EcoBoost 150 stands against C-SUV
Comparison across 44 C-SUV marketed between 2018–2022.
Combined consumption32e / 44
6.6 L/100
Min 8.6 L/100 · Cupra Formentor VZMax 4.3 L/100 · Bmw X1 xDrive18d
Tank range37e / 40
818 km
Min 705 km · SEAT Ateca 2.0 TSI 190 FR 4Drive 7DSGMax 1 419 km · Bmw X1 xDrive18d
0–100 km/h41e / 44
9,8 s
Min 10,8 s · Peugeot 3008 BlueHDi 130 EAT8Max 4,9 s · Cupra Formentor VZ
Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)
Q3 Sportback150 hp · 0-100 9.1 s
Q3 SUV150 hp · 0-100 9.1 s
X1 sDrive18i140 hp · 0-100 9.7 s
X2 sDrive18i140 hp · 0-100 9.6 s
Cross-energy alternatives
Same needs, different powertrain.
Compare
Popular duels involving the Kuga EcoBoost 150
Frequently asked questions
Ford Kuga EcoBoost 150: what you need to know
Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.
818 km on a full tank (6.6 L/100 on the combined cycle) - 37th of 40 in autonomie du segment.
Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.
The Bmw X1 xDrive18d leads in Combined consumption (4.3 L/100 vs 6.6 L/100). The choice depends on your priorities: check the Kuga EcoBoost 150 vs Bmw X1 xDrive18d duel for a detailed comparison.
Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.