Skip to main content
CaralogyCaralogy
HomeBrandsRoad TripBudgetDuelGuides
Caralogy

The car comparison platform. Physics simulation, road trips, real costs.

Navigation
All brandsCar duelRunning costsMotorwayMethodology
Simulators
Motorway simulatorRunning costsPerformance duel
Brands
VolkswagenBMWMercedesToyotaTeslaAudi
FRENDEESIT
© 2026 Caralogy · All rights reserved
  1. Home
  2. /Motorway
  3. /family SUV
AX4PetrolvsB220dDiesel
  • MotorwayMotorwayRange and charging
  • PerformancePerformance0-100, top speed
  • ConsumptionConsumptionYearly cost
  • SpecsX4 · 220d

BMW X4 M40i G02 vs BMW 220d Gran Tourer F44

Trip mapped at a glance. Charging stops visible, total duration predictable. Caralogy simulation at 130 km/h.

family SUV · 2018 vs 2020 · Paris → Marseille · 775 km · 130 km/h
BMWPetrol

X4 M40i G02

354 ch · 2018

VS
BMWDieselPlus rapide

220d Gran Tourer F44

190 ch · 2020

Simulation trip
Assumptions: 130 km/h · start réservoir plein · mild weather

Result · total trip time

ABMW X4 M40i G02

7h06charging included

1 stop · 129.49 €

Gap5 minin favour of 220d Gran Tourer
BBMW 220d Gran Tourer F44

7h01no stop

0 stops · 70.63 €

Paris → Marseille · 130 km/h · Caralogy simulation
MeasureX4 M40i G02220d Gran Tourer F44Gap
Total time7h067h015 min · 220d Gran Tourer F44
Charging stops1 stop0 stops1 stop · 220d Gran Tourer F44
Cost of energy used129.49 €70.63 €58.86 € · 220d Gran Tourer F44

Visualise the trip

Both vehicles drive at 130 km/h. The difference comes from charging stops.

BMWPetrol
X4 M40i G02
100%
760 km
Range
Paris
0 km · departure
Refuel 1
5 min · +59 L · 126.94 €
Marseille
775 km · Arrival 7h06
1
Stops
7h06
Duration
129.49 €
Cost of energy used
BMWDieselFastest
220d Gran Tourer F44
100%
1214 km
Range
Paris
0 km · departure
Marseille
775 km · Arrival 7h01
0
Stops
7h01
Duration
70.63 €
Cost of energy used

The 5-minute lead of the 220d Gran Tourer F44 does not come from driving speed, but from one fewer charging stop on this route (0 vs 1).

Both vehicles drove at 130 km/h for the entire trip. The gap is built at the stops: no stop for the 220d Gran Tourer F44 versus 1 stop of 5 min for the X4 M40i G02.

Motorway consumption: the Caralogy methodology

The official WLTP figures (9,1 L/100km for X4 M40i G02 and 4,5 L/100km for 220d Gran Tourer F44) are measured on a mixed cycle averaging ~46 km/h. At a steady 130 km/h, aerodynamic drag weighs much more heavily - it grows with the square of speed. Caralogy calculates a motorway consumption specific to each vehicle based on its aerodynamic profile (SCx), weight and power curve - not a uniform correction factor. For this trip, the simulation yields 7,7 L/100km (X4 M40i G02) and 4,2 L/100km (220d Gran Tourer F44). Full methodology: see the assumptions below the controls.

Energy cost breakdown for your trip Paris → Marseille

The cost per kilometre depends on the electricity rate applied to each segment - based on the energy source used at that point of the trip.

BMW X4 M40i G02

SegmentEnergy usedDistanceConsumption€/kmCost (€)
Paris → Aix-en-Provence, A7fuel · 2.17 €/L760 km59 L consumed0.167 €/km126.94 €
Aix-en-Provence, A7 → Marseillefuel · 2.17 €/L15 km1 L consumed0.170 €/km2.55 €
Trip total129.49 €

BMW 220d Gran Tourer F44

SegmentEnergy usedDistanceConsumption€/kmCost (€)
Paris → Marseillefuel · 2.17 €/L775 km33 L consumed0.091 €/km70.63 €
Trip total70.63 €

What produces these figures

WLTP combined consumption
9.1 L/100 km · 4.5 L/100 km
Fuel tank
65 L · 51 L

Compare with another vehicle

Replace one of the two with an alternative from the same segment

BMWPetrol

X4 M40i G02

354 ch · 2018

BMWDiesel

220d Gran Tourer F44

190 ch · 2020

Other duels you might be interested in

BMWVSPorsche

X4 M40i vs Macan S

MercedesVSBMW

V 300 d 4MATIC (long) vs 220d Gran Tourer

PorscheVSBMW

Macan GTS vs X4 M40i

MercedesVSBMW

V 300 d 4MATIC vs 220d Gran Tourer

Frequently asked questions

On Paris → Marseille (775 km at 130 km/h), the 220d Gran Tourer F44 arrives in 7h01 with 0 fuel stops.

WLTP consumption does not reflect motorway reality. Aerodynamic drag grows with the square of speed, so real consumption is 15 to 25 % higher than WLTP combined. Caralogy calculates a highway consumption specific to each vehicle based on its aerodynamic profile (SCx), weight and power curve.

Total time = driving time + charging time. Driving time is calculated at an average speed of 130 km/h on the motorway (adjustable). Charging time is calculated based on the real power curve of each vehicle, respecting the optimal 10 → 80 % range and the maximum power accepted by the chargers on the route.

No. The displayed cost covers only the energy consumed during the trip: kWh × energy rate, with a mix of home charging and DC fast chargers. Battery wear is a long-term ownership cost, not a trip cost.

On this trip, the energy used costs 129.49 € (X4 M40i G02) and 70.63 € (220d Gran Tourer F44). For reference, an equivalent Peugeot 3008 1.2 PureTech 130 (~7.8 L/100 km) would cost about 112 € in fuel.