Aller au contenu principal
CaralogyCaralogy
HomeBrandsRoad TripBudgetDuelGuides
Caralogy

The car comparison platform. Physics simulation, road trips, real costs.

Navigation
All brandsCar duelRunning costsMotorwayMethodology
Simulators
Motorway simulatorRunning costsPerformance duel
Brands
VolkswagenBMWMercedesToyotaTeslaAudi
FRDEESIT
© 2026 Caralogy · All rights reserved
Home›Motorway›Tesla Model 3 vs Alpine A110

Motorway range comparison

Tesla Model 3 Performance vs Alpine A110 GT 300

Trip mapped at a glance. Charging stops visible, total duration predictable. Caralogy simulation at 130 km/h.

TeslaBEV

Model 3 Performance

450 ch · 74 kWh · 2019

VS
AlpinePetrolPlus rapide

A110 GT 300

305 ch · 2022

MotorwayRange & chargingPerformance0-100, top speedConsumptionAnnual TCO
Simulation trip

Paris → Marseille · 130 km/h · Caralogy simulation

Model 3 PerformanceA110 GT 300
Total time7h247h06−18 min
Charging stops3 stops1 stop−2 stops
Total cost52,27 €−41,81 €94,08 €

Visualise the trip

Both vehicles drive at 130 km/h. The difference comes from charging stops.

TeslaBEV
Model 3 Performance
100%
378 km
Range
Paris
0 km · departure
Charge 1
7 min · +30 kWh · 13.32 €
Charge 2
7 min · +30 kWh · 13.32 €
Charge 3
8 min · +32 kWh · 14.28 €
Marseille
775 km · Arrival 7h24
3
Stops
7h24
Duration
52,27 €
Cost
AlpinePetrolFastest
A110 GT 300
100%
664 km
Range
Paris
0 km · departure
Refuel 1
5 min · +41 L · 80.59 €
Marseille
775 km · Arrival 7h06
1
Stops
7h06
Duration
94,08 €
Cost

Analysis

The 18-minute lead of the A110 GT 300 (combustion) comes from not needing a charging stop: 1 stop of 5 min versus 3 stops totalling 23 min for the Model 3 Performance (electric).

Both vehicles drove at 130 km/h for the entire trip. The A110 GT 300 (combustion) makes 1 stop of 5 min, the Model 3 Performance (electric) 3 stops totalling 23 min. Road safety reminder: on a trip of this duration, it is recommended to stop for at least 51 min total (17 min every 2h). The energy cost is 52,27 € for Model 3 Performance versus 94,08 € for A110 GT 300.

Motorway consumption: the Caralogy methodology

The official WLTP figures (16,6 kWh/100km for Model 3 Performance and 7,1 L/100km for A110 GT 300) are measured on a mixed cycle averaging ~46 km/h. At a steady 130 km/h, aerodynamic drag weighs much more heavily - it grows with the square of speed. Caralogy calculates a motorway consumption specific to each vehicle based on its aerodynamic profile (SCx), weight and power curve - not a uniform correction factor. For this trip, the simulation yields 19,6 kWh/100km (Model 3 Performance) and 6,1 L/100km (A110 GT 300). Full methodology: see the dedicated button above the summary.

What about a 200 km round trip?

On a 200 km round trip (e.g. a weekend getaway), the electric or plug-in hybrid vehicle completes the entire journey on home energy at 0.18 €/kWh - with no charging stop. The time advantage of the combustion car on long-distance motorways disappears entirely, and the economic advantage of electric strengthens considerably.

Energy cost breakdown for your trip Paris → Marseille

The cost per kilometre depends on the electricity rate applied to each segment - based on the energy source used at that point of the trip.

Tesla

Model 3 Performance

SegmentDistance€/kmCost
Paris → Tournus, A6initial energy charged at home · 0,21 €/kWh340 km67 kWh consumed0,041 €/km13,99 €
Tournus, A6 → Valence, A7energy charged at Supercharger 254 kW · 0,45 €/kWh151 km30 kWh consumed0,088 €/km13,32 €
Valence, A7 → Montélimar, A7energy charged at Supercharger 254 kW · 0,45 €/kWh151 km30 kWh consumed0,088 €/km13,32 €
Montélimar, A7 → Marseilleenergy charged at Supercharger 238 kW · 0,45 €/kWh132 km26 kWh consumed0,088 €/km11,64 €
Trip total52,27 €
Alpine

A110 GT 300

SegmentDistance€/kmCost
Paris → Manosque, A51fuel · 1,99 €/L664 km41 L consumed0,121 €/km80,60 €
Manosque, A51 → Marseillefuel · 1,99 €/L111 km7 L consumed0,121 €/km13,48 €
Trip total94,08 €

Range recovered by stop duration

How many kilometres do you recover depending on the time spent at the charger? Comparison at nominal peak power.

Charging stop durationTesla Model 3 PerformanceAlpine A110 GT 300
5 minutes~75 km-
10 minutes~149 km-
20 minutes~298 km-
Full session 10 → 80 %~265 km19 min-

Compare with another vehicle

Replace one of the two with an alternative from the same segment

TeslaBEV

Model 3 Performance

450 ch · 74 kWh · 2019

AlpinePetrol

A110 GT 300

305 ch · 2022

Other duels you might be interested in

TeslaVSVolvo

Model 3 Performance vs V60 T8 AWD Recharge

BmwVSTesla

i4 M50 xDrive vs Model 3 Performance

TeslaVSBmw

Model 3 Performance vs i4 eDrive35

BmwVSTesla

M4 Competition Convertible vs Model 3 Performance

Frequently asked questions

The advantage comes from the combo real range + charging speed. On Paris → Marseille (775 km at 130 km/h), the A110 GT 300 arrives in 7h06 with 1 charging stop.

WLTP consumption does not reflect motorway reality. Aerodynamic drag grows with the square of speed, so real consumption is 15 to 25 % higher than WLTP combined. Caralogy calculates a highway consumption specific to each vehicle based on its aerodynamic profile (SCx), weight and power curve.

Total time = driving time + charging time. Driving time is calculated at an average speed of 130 km/h on the motorway (adjustable). Charging time is calculated based on the real power curve of each vehicle, respecting the optimal 10 → 80 % range and the maximum power accepted by the chargers on the route.

No. The displayed cost covers only the energy consumed during the trip: kWh × energy rate, with a mix of home charging and DC fast chargers. Battery wear is a long-term ownership cost, not a trip cost.

Electric: 52,27 € (Model 3 Performance) and 94,08 € (A110 GT 300). An equivalent petrol SUV (~8 L/100 km) would cost about 115 € in motorway fuel. Electric costs less in energy but adds charging stops.