TeslaBEV
Model S Performance
778 ch · 100 kWh · 2019
Trip mapped at a glance. Charging stops visible, total duration predictable. Caralogy simulation at 130 km/h.
| Measure | Model S Performance | M5 F90 | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total time | 7h20 | 7h01 | 19 min · M5 F90 |
| Charging stops | 2 stops | 0 stops | 2 stops · M5 F90 |
| Cost of energy used | 59.47 € | 129.49 € | 70.02 € · Model S Performance |
Both vehicles drove at 130 km/h for the entire trip. The M5 F90 (combustion) makes no stop, the Model S Performance (electric) 2 stops totalling 19 min. Road safety reminder: on a trip of this duration, it is recommended to stop for at least 51 min total (17 min every 2h). The energy cost is 59,47 € for Model S Performance versus 129,49 € for M5 F90.
The official WLTP figures (19,3 kWh/100km for Model S Performance and 10,6 L/100km for M5 F90) are measured on a mixed cycle averaging ~46 km/h. At a steady 130 km/h, aerodynamic drag weighs much more heavily - it grows with the square of speed. Caralogy calculates a motorway consumption specific to each vehicle based on its aerodynamic profile (SCx), weight and power curve - not a uniform correction factor. For this trip, the simulation yields 20,5 kWh/100km (Model S Performance) and 7,7 L/100km (M5 F90). Full methodology: see the assumptions below the controls.
On a 200 km round trip (e.g. a weekend getaway), the electric or plug-in hybrid vehicle completes the entire journey on home energy at 0.20 €/kWh - with no charging stop. The time advantage of the combustion car on long-distance motorways disappears entirely, and the economic advantage of electric strengthens considerably.
| Segment | Energy used | Distance | Consumption | €/km | Cost (€) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paris → Limonest, A6 | initial energy charged at home · 0.20 €/kWh | 438 km | 90 kWh consumed | 0.041 €/km | 18.01 € |
| Limonest, A6 → Montélimar, A7 | energy charged at Supercharger 240 kW · 0.60 €/kWh | 195 km | 40 kWh consumed | 0.123 €/km | 24.00 € |
| Montélimar, A7 → Marseille | energy charged at Supercharger 235 kW · 0.60 €/kWh | 142 km | 29 kWh consumed | 0.123 €/km | 17.46 € |
| Trip total | 59.47 € |
| Segment | Energy used | Distance | Consumption | €/km | Cost (€) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paris → Marseille | fuel · 2.17 €/L | 775 km | 60 L consumed | 0.167 €/km | 129.49 € |
| Trip total | 129.49 € |
| Charging stop duration | Tesla Model S Performance | BMW M5 F90 |
|---|---|---|
| 5 minutes | ~71 km | - |
| 10 minutes | ~142 km | - |
| 20 minutes | ~284 km | - |
| Full session 10 → 80 % | ~341 km · 26 min | - |
Replace one of the two with an alternative from the same segment
778 ch · 100 kWh · 2019
600 ch · 2020
The advantage comes from the combo real range + charging speed. On Paris → Marseille (775 km at 130 km/h), the M5 F90 arrives in 7h01 with 0 fuel stops.
WLTP consumption does not reflect motorway reality. Aerodynamic drag grows with the square of speed, so real consumption is 15 to 25 % higher than WLTP combined. Caralogy calculates a highway consumption specific to each vehicle based on its aerodynamic profile (SCx), weight and power curve.
Total time = driving time + charging time. Driving time is calculated at an average speed of 130 km/h on the motorway (adjustable). Charging time is calculated based on the real power curve of each vehicle, respecting the optimal 10 → 80 % range and the maximum power accepted by the chargers on the route.
No. The displayed cost covers only the energy consumed during the trip: kWh × energy rate, with a mix of home charging and DC fast chargers. Battery wear is a long-term ownership cost, not a trip cost.
On this trip, the energy used costs 59.47 € (Model S Performance) and 129.49 € (M5 F90). For reference, an equivalent BMW 530i (~8.0 L/100 km) would cost about 115 € in fuel.