On a 100 km mixed trip, the BMW i5 xDrive40 is about 15% cheaper than the Audi A6 Avant e-tron with default parameters. This ratio shifts with your actual energy prices - simulate for your profile.
Consumption comparison
Same car, two powertrains. The simulator below calculates the gap based on your mileage and charging type.
387 €per year
12,9 kWh/100 km weighted · 2,58 € per 100 km · 1 934 kWh per year
Cheaper to runAnnual mileage
15 000 km/an
Simulated driving mix
Drag anywhere on the bar to adjust
Charging type
| Profile | Split | i5 | A6 | Gap | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| City | 70 % city · 25 % road · 5 % motorway | 329 € | 380 € | 50 € | i5 |
| Mixed | 30 % city · 50 % road · 20 % motorway | 387 € | 446 € | 59 € | i5 |
| Long-distance | 10 % city · 40 % road · 50 % motorway | 458 € | 528 € | 70 € | i5 |
On a 100 km mixed trip, the BMW i5 xDrive40 is about 15% cheaper than the Audi A6 Avant e-tron with default parameters. This ratio shifts with your actual energy prices - simulate for your profile.
Audi A6 Avant e-tron offers more range: 520 km vs 486 km for BMW i5 xDrive40 (WLTP/EPA). In real motorway use, expect 10-20% less depending on temperature.
The BMW i5 xDrive40 is cheaper across all distances with default rates. If your energy prices differ significantly, simulate to see the real impact on your budget.