C8 · GENERATION 2026 · GRAND TOURER
AudiBEV

A6 Avant e-tron

286 hp, 520 km range, 7,0 s 0-100 : among the 17 grand tourers electric 2024–2028, the A6 Avant e-tron ranks 10th of 16 in WLTP range, 8th of 14 in DC charge power, 17th of 17 in 0–100 km/h. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.

Energy cost · estimate4,33315,000 km · UK mix · home 0,21 £/kWhRange →

Power

286hp

435 Nm · 286 hp elec

0 → 100 km/h

7.0s

VMax 210 km/h

Range

520km

WLTP

DC charging

225kW

Technical identity card

Full specifications Audi A6 Avant e-tron

Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.

Powertrain

Puissance électrique286 hp
Combined power286 hp
Couple435 Nm
GearboxMono-rapport
TransmissionPropulsion

Battery and charging

Battery capacity75.8 kWh
Range WLTP520 km
Charge AC max11 kW
Charge DC max225 kW

Performance

0 → 100 km/h7,0 s
VMax210 km/h

Dimensions and environment

Length4,928 mm
Wheelbase2,950 mm
Width1,923 mm
Height1,493 mm
Boot502 L
Kerb weight2,110 kg
Cd0.26
CO₂ WLTP0 g/km

Caralogy Methodology

Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.

See full methodology →

Manufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance

Among the 17 grand tourers electric, the A6 Avant e-tron ranks (mid-table) in WLTP range. Caralogy simulates its real-world behaviour: motorway simulation, consumption simulation and performance simulation.

Caralogy Analysis

Tailored to this vehicle?

Caralogy Verdict
Suitable for

Long daily commute (>50 km/day) without range anxiety.

Less suitable for

Some metrics lag behind the segment. Check the rankings above to identify weak points.

Alternatives to consider

If the priority is WLTP range, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron quattro 315 kW (1st with 730 km) takes the lead. If the priority is DC charge power, the Audi e-tron GT quattro (1st with 320 kW) takes the lead.

Real-world range: 520 km WLTP (10th of 16 in WLTP range)

The A6 Avant e-tron offers 520 km of WLTP range. The segment reference is the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron quattro 315 kW (730 km).

Charging: 225 kW DC (8th of 14 in DC charge power)

The A6 Avant e-tron accepts up to 225 kW DC fast charging. The segment reference is the Audi e-tron GT quattro (320 kW).

Segment positioning

Where the A6 Avant e-tron stands against grand tourers electric

Comparison across 17 grand tourers electric marketed between 2024–2028.

WLTP range10e / 16
520 km
Min 454 km · Bmw i5 M60 xDrive TouringMax 730 km · Audi A6 Sportback e-tron quattro 315 kW
DC charge power8e / 14
225 kW
Min 205 kW · Bmw i5 eDrive40Max 320 kW · Audi e-tron GT quattro
0–100 km/h17e / 17
7,0 s
Min 7,0 s · Audi A6 Avant e-tronMax 3,3 s · Audi S e-tron GT

Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)

Cross-energy alternatives

Same needs, different powertrain.

Model family

The full Audi A6 C8 range

Generation C8 launched in 2018. Available versions sorted by energy.

Other versions of the C8

Compare

Popular duels involving the A6 Avant e-tron

Frequently asked questions

Audi A6 Avant e-tron: what you need to know

Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.

Among the 17 grand tourers electric 2024–2028, the A6 Avant e-tron ranks 10th of 16 in WLTP range (520 km, behind the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron quattro 315 kW), 8th of 14 in DC charge power (225 kW, behind the Audi e-tron GT quattro), 17th of 17 in 0–100 km/h (7.0 s, behind the Audi S e-tron GT).

520 km WLTP announced — making it the 10th of 16 in autonomie du segment out of 16 models. The reference is the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron quattro 315 kW (730 km).

Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.

Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.