G60 · GENERATION 2025 · GRAND TOURER
BMWBEV

i5 xDrive40

394 hp, 486 km range, 5,4 s 0-100 : among the 29 grand tourers electric 2023–2027, the i5 xDrive40 ranks 15th of 28 in WLTP range, 26th of 27 in DC charge power, 25th of 29 in 0–100 km/h. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.

Energy cost · estimate3,75715,000 km · UK mix · home 0,21 £/kWhRange →

Power

394hp

590 Nm · 394 hp elec

0 → 100 km/h

5.4s

VMax 215 km/h

Range

486km

WLTP

DC charging

205kW

Technical identity card

Full specifications BMW i5 xDrive40

Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.

Powertrain

Puissance électrique394 hp
Combined power394 hp
Couple590 Nm
GearboxMono-rapport Automatique
TransmissionPropulsion

Battery and charging

Battery capacity75.5 kWh
Range WLTP486 km
Charge AC max22 kW
Charge DC max205 kW

Performance

0 → 100 km/h5,4 s
VMax215 km/h

Dimensions and environment

Length5,060 mm
Wheelbase2,995 mm
Width1,900 mm
Height1,515 mm
Boot490 L
Kerb weight2,280 kg
Cd0.23

Caralogy Methodology

Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.

See full methodology →

Manufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance

Among the 29 grand tourers electric, the i5 xDrive40 ranks (mid-table) in WLTP range. Caralogy simulates its real-world behaviour: motorway simulation, consumption simulation and performance simulation.

Caralogy Analysis

Tailored to this vehicle?

Caralogy Verdict
Suitable for

Long daily commute (>50 km/day) without range anxiety.

Less suitable for

Regular family use with bulky luggage. The space and boot are sport-calibrated, not utility. A sedan or SUV from the same manufacturer would be more practical daily.

Alternatives to consider

If the priority is WLTP range, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron quattro 315 kW (1st with 730 km) takes the lead. If the priority is DC charge power, the Audi S e-tron GT (1st with 320 kW) takes the lead.

Real-world range: 486 km WLTP (15th of 28 in WLTP range)

The i5 xDrive40 offers 486 km of WLTP range. The segment reference is the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron quattro 315 kW (730 km).

Charging: 205 kW DC (26th of 27 in DC charge power)

The i5 xDrive40 accepts up to 205 kW DC fast charging. The segment reference is the Audi S e-tron GT (320 kW).

Segment positioning

Where the i5 xDrive40 stands against grand tourers electric

Comparison across 29 grand tourers electric marketed between 2023–2027.

WLTP range15e / 28
486 km
Min 407 km · Porsche Taycan 4SMax 730 km · Audi A6 Sportback e-tron quattro 315 kW
DC charge power26e / 27
205 kW
Min 205 kW · Bmw i5 eDrive40 TouringMax 320 kW · Audi S e-tron GT
0–100 km/h25e / 29
5,4 s
Min 6,1 s · Bmw i5 eDrive40 TouringMax 2,1 s · Tesla Model S Plaid

Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)

Cross-energy alternatives

Same needs, different powertrain.

Model family

The full BMW I5 G60 range

Generation G60 launched in 2024. Available versions sorted by energy.

Other versions of the G60

Compare

Popular duels involving the i5 xDrive40

Frequently asked questions

BMW i5 xDrive40: what you need to know

Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.

Among the 29 grand tourers electric 2023–2027, the i5 xDrive40 ranks 15th of 28 in WLTP range (486 km, behind the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron quattro 315 kW), 26th of 27 in DC charge power (205 kW, behind the Audi S e-tron GT), 25th of 29 in 0–100 km/h (5.4 s, behind the Tesla Model S Plaid).

486 km WLTP announced - making it the 15th of 28 in autonomie du segment out of 28 models. The reference is the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron quattro 315 kW (730 km).

Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.

Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.