On a 100 km mixed trip, the Tesla Model X Performance and BMW iX xDrive50 have a near-identical cost per km with default parameters. The gap becomes significant once you enter your actual energy prices.
Consumption comparison
Same car, two powertrains. The simulator below calculates the gap based on your mileage and charging type.
666 €per year
22,2 kWh/100 km weighted · 4,44 € per 100 km · 3 328 kWh per year
Cheaper to runAnnual mileage
15 000 km/an
Simulated driving mix
Drag anywhere on the bar to adjust
Charging type
| Profile | Split | Model | iX | Gap | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| City | 70 % city · 25 % road · 5 % motorway | 640 € | 689 € | 49 € | Model |
| Mixed | 30 % city · 50 % road · 20 % motorway | 666 € | 675 € | 9 € | Nearly level |
| Long-distance | 10 % city · 40 % road · 50 % motorway | 662 € | 692 € | 29 € | Model |
On a 100 km mixed trip, the Tesla Model X Performance and BMW iX xDrive50 have a near-identical cost per km with default parameters. The gap becomes significant once you enter your actual energy prices.
BMW iX xDrive50 offers more range: 630 km vs 487 km for Tesla Model X Performance (WLTP/EPA). In real motorway use, expect 10-20% less depending on temperature.
The Tesla Model X Performance is cheaper across all distances with default rates. If your energy prices differ significantly, simulate to see the real impact on your budget.