BMW iX xDrive50
523 hp, 630 km range, 4,6 s 0-100 : among the 7 E-SUV electric 2021–2025, the iX xDrive50 ranks 1st of 7 in WLTP range, 6th of 6 in DC charge power, 5th of 7 in 0–100 km/h. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.
- Power
- 523 hp
- 765 Nm, dont 523 hp elec
- 0 → 100 km/h
- 4.6 s
- VMax 200 km/h
- Range
- 630 km
- WLTP
- DC charging
- 195 kW
Full specifications
Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.
Powertrain
- Puissance électrique
- 523 hp
- Combined power
- 523 hp
- Couple
- 765 Nm
- Gearbox
- Mono-rapport Automatique
- Transmission
- Integrale (AWD)
Battery and charging
- Battery capacity
- 105.2 kWh
- Range WLTP
- 630 km
- Charge DC max
- 195 kW
- Charge time 10→80 %
- 35 min
- Conso élec WLTP
- 21.1 kWh/100 km
Performance
- 0 → 100 km/h
- 4,6 s
- VMax
- 200 km/h
Dimensions and environment
- Kerb weight
- 2,585 kg
- Cd
- 0.25
Caralogy Methodology
Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.
See full methodologyManufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance
Among the 7 E-SUV electric, the iX xDrive50 ranks (best in segment) in WLTP range. Caralogy simulates its real-world behaviour: motorway simulation, consumption simulation and performance simulation.
Tailored to this vehicle?
Long daily commute (>50 km/day) without range anxiety. 1st of 7 in WLTP range (630 km).
Regular family use with bulky luggage. The space and boot are sport-calibrated, not utility. A sedan or SUV from the same manufacturer would be more practical daily.
If the priority is DC charge power, the Xpeng G9 (1st with 300 kW) takes the lead. If the priority is 0–100 km/h, the Tesla Model X Plaid (1st with 2.6 s) takes the lead.
Real-world range: 630 km WLTP (1st of 7 in WLTP range)
The iX xDrive50 offers 630 km of WLTP range. The segment reference is the BMW iX xDrive50 (630 km).
Charging: 195 kW DC (6th of 6 in DC charge power)
The iX xDrive50 accepts up to 195 kW DC fast charging. The segment reference is the Xpeng G9 (300 kW).
Go beyond this analysis
Recalculate everything for your own profile with the three physics simulators that power this page.
Running cost for your profile
Adjust mileage, driving mix and charging type to estimate your annual energy budget.
Launch simulatorLong-distance trip
Simulate any motorway trip: time, charging stops, total cost.
Simulate a tripChronos & accélération
0-100, 0-200, courbe de vitesse, positionnement segment.
Voir la performanceAutonomie réelle
Simulez l’autonomie selon la vitesse, la température et le style.
Simuler l’autonomieWhere the iX xDrive50 stands against E-SUV electric
Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)
Cross-energy alternatives
Same needs, different powertrain.
The full BMW iX I20 range
Generation I20 launched in 2022. Available versions sorted by energy.
Other versions of the I20
Popular duels involving the iX xDrive50
Continue with the BMW iX xDrive50
The same car, from other angles.
BMW iX xDrive50: what you need to know
Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.
Where does the iX xDrive50 rank in its segment?
Among the 7 E-SUV electric 2021–2025, the iX xDrive50 ranks 1st of 7 in WLTP range (630 km, behind the BMW iX xDrive50), 6th of 6 in DC charge power (195 kW, behind the Xpeng G9), 5th of 7 in 0–100 km/h (4.6 s, behind the Tesla Model X Plaid).
What is the WLTP range of the iX xDrive50?
630 km WLTP announced - making it the 1st of 7 in autonomie du segment out of 7 models. The reference is the BMW iX xDrive50 (630 km).
How much does the iX xDrive50 cost to run?
Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.
How does Caralogy calculate its figures?
Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.