A3 Sedan
150 hp, 8,4 s 0-100 : among the 18 compacts 2024–2028, the A3 Sedan ranks 7th of 18 in Combined consumption, 6th of 18 in Tank range, 11th of 18 in 0–100 km/h. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.
Power
150hp
250 Nm
0 → 100 km/h
8.4s
VMax 231 km/h
Cons.
6.0L
/100 km
Tank
50L
On this page
Technical identity card
Full specifications Audi A3 Sedan
Manufacturer data and values calibrated by the Caralogy simulation engine.
Powertrain
| Architecture | Unknown |
| Displacement | 1,498 cm\u00b3 |
| Power | 150 hp |
| Couple | 250 Nm |
| Gearbox | Manual 6 rapports Manual |
| Transmission | FWD |
Consumption
| Cons. WLTP | 6,0 L/100km |
| Tank | 50 L |
Performance
| 0 → 100 km/h | 8,4 s |
| VMax | 231 km/h |
Dimensions and environment
| Length | 4,504 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2,618 mm |
| Width | 1,816 mm |
| Height | 1,391 mm |
| Boot | 425 L |
| Kerb weight | 1,290 kg |
| Cd | 0.27 |
| CO₂ WLTP | 136 g/km |
Caralogy Methodology
Motorway and performance values calibrated by the Caralogy physics simulation engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves).
See full methodology →Manufacturer data · motorway values calibrated by the Caralogy engine
Among the 18 compacts, the A3 Sedan ranks (mid-table) in fuel consumption. Caralogy simulates its real-world cost: motorway simulation, consumption simulation and performance simulation.
Caralogy Analysis · tailored to this vehicle
Caralogy Verdict
Suitable for
compact among the best in segment: 6th of 18 in Tank range (833 km).
Alternatives to consider
If the priority is Combined consumption, the Audi A3 Sedan (1st with 4.7 L/100) takes the lead. If the priority is Tank range, the Audi A3 Sedan (1st with 957 km) takes the lead.
Fuel consumption: 6.0 L/100 L/100 (7th of 18 in Combined consumption)
The A3 Sedan consumes 6.0 L/100 on the WLTP combined cycle. The segment reference is the Audi A3 Sedan (4.7 L/100).
Tank range: 833 km (6th of 18 in Tank range)
On a full tank, the A3 Sedan covers 833 km on the combined cycle. The segment reference reaches 957 km.
Go beyond this analysis
Recalculate everything for your own profile with the three physics simulators that power this page.
Running cost for your profile
Adjust mileage, driving mix and charging type to estimate your annual energy budget.
Launch simulator →Long-distance trip
Simulate any motorway trip: time, charging stops, total cost.
Simulate a trip →Chronos & accélération
0-100, 0-200, courbe de vitesse, positionnement segment.
Voir la performance →Segment positioning
Where the A3 Sedan stands against compacts
Comparison across 18 compacts marketed between 2024–2028.
Combined consumption
7eout of 18
Tank range
6eout of 18
0–100 km/h
11eout of 18
Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)
218i Coupé
156 hp · 0-100 8.7 s
118i
140 hp · 0-100 8.5 s
218i
140 hp · 0-100 9.3 s
218i
140 hp · 0-100 8.7 s
Cross-energy alternatives
Same needs, different powertrain.
Model family
The full Audi A3 8Y range
Generation 8Y launched in 2020. Available versions sorted by energy.
Other versions of the 8Y
Compare
Popular duels involving the A3 Sedan
Take the next step
Find a A3 Sedan or value yours
Caralogy receives no commission on these external links.
Frequently asked questions
Audi A3 Sedan: what you need to know
Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.
Among the 18 compacts 2024–2028, the A3 Sedan ranks 7th of 18 in Combined consumption (6.0 L/100, behind the Audi A3 Sedan), 6th of 18 in Tank range (833 km, behind the Audi A3 Sedan), 11th of 18 in 0–100 km/h (8.4 s, behind the Audi RS 3 Sportback).
833 km on a full tank (6.0 L/100 on the combined cycle) — 6th of 18 in autonomie du segment.
Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.
The Audi A3 Sedan leads in Combined consumption (4.7 L/100 vs 6.0 L/100). The choice depends on your priorities: check the A3 Sedan vs Audi A3 Sedan duel for a detailed comparison.
Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.