Among the 92 compacts 2020–2024, the 218i Coupé ranks 79th of 88 in Combined consumption (7.1 L/100, behind the Bmw 216d Steptronic), 68th of 84 in Tank range (732 km, behind the Bmw 216d Steptronic), 54th of 92 in 0–100 km/h (8.7 s, behind the BMW M2).
G42 · GENERATION 2022 → · COMPACT
BMWICE
218i Coupé
156 hp, 8,7 s 0-100 : among the 92 compacts 2020–2024, the 218i Coupé ranks 79th of 88 in Combined consumption, 68th of 84 in Tank range, 54th of 92 in 0–100 km/h. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.
Power
156hp
250 Nm
0 → 100 km/h
8.7s
VMax 224 km/h
Cons.
7.1L
/100 km
Tank
52L
Technical identity card
Full specifications BMW 218i Coupé
Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.
Powertrain
| Displacement | 1,998 cm³ |
| Power | 156 hp |
| Couple | 250 Nm |
| Gearbox | Convertisseur de couple 8 rapports Automatique |
Consumption
| Cons. WLTP | 7.1 L/100km |
| Tank | 52 L |
Performance
| 0 → 100 km/h | 8,7 s |
| VMax | 224 km/h |
Dimensions and environment
| Length | 4,537 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2,741 mm |
| Width | 1,838 mm |
| Height | 1,390 mm |
| Boot | 390 L |
| Kerb weight | 1,485 kg |
| Cd | 0.26 |
| CO₂ WLTP | 146 g/km |
Caralogy Methodology
Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.
See full methodology →Manufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance
Among the 92 compacts, the 218i Coupé ranks (in the bottom third) in fuel consumption. Caralogy simulates its real-world cost: motorway simulation, consumption simulation and performance simulation.
Caralogy Analysis
Tailored to this vehicle?
Fuel consumption: 7.1 L/100 L/100 (79th of 88 in Combined consumption)
The 218i Coupé consumes 7.1 L/100 on the WLTP combined cycle. The segment reference is the Bmw 216d Steptronic (3.9 L/100).
Tank range: 732 km (68th of 84 in Tank range)
On a full tank, the 218i Coupé covers 732 km on the combined cycle. The segment reference reaches 1308 km.
Go beyond this analysis
Recalculate everything for your own profile with the three physics simulators that power this page.
Running cost for your profile
Adjust mileage, driving mix and charging type to estimate your annual energy budget.
Launch simulator →Long-distance trip
Simulate any motorway trip: time, charging stops, total cost.
Simulate a trip →Chronos & accélération
0-100, 0-200, courbe de vitesse, positionnement segment.
Voir la performance →Segment positioning
Where the 218i Coupé stands against compacts
Comparison across 92 compacts marketed between 2020–2024.
Combined consumption79e / 88
7.1 L/100
Min 10 L/100 · BMW M2Max 3.9 L/100 · Bmw 216d Steptronic
Tank range68e / 84
732 km
Min 520 km · BMW M2Max 1 308 km · Bmw 216d Steptronic
0–100 km/h54e / 92
8,7 s
Min 12,3 s · Hyundai i30 Wagon 1.5 DPi 110 PSMax 4,1 s · BMW M2
Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)
A3 allstreet150 hp · 0-100 8.4 s
A3 allstreet150 hp · 0-100 8.8 s
A3 allstreet150 hp · 0-100 8.3 s
A3 Sedan150 hp · 0-100 8.4 s
Cross-energy alternatives
Same needs, different powertrain.
Model family
The full BMW 2 Series G42 range
Generation G42 launched in 2022. Available versions sorted by energy.
Other versions of the G42
Compare
Popular duels involving the 218i Coupé
Frequently asked questions
BMW 218i Coupé: what you need to know
Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.
732 km on a full tank (7.1 L/100 on the combined cycle) - 68th of 84 in autonomie du segment.
Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.
The Bmw 216d Steptronic leads in Combined consumption (3.9 L/100 vs 7.1 L/100). The choice depends on your priorities: check the 218i Coupé vs Bmw 216d Steptronic duel for a detailed comparison.
Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.