Audi A3 Sedan
204 hp, 6,3 s 0-100 : among the 18 compacts 2024–2028, the A3 Sedan ranks 12th of 18 in Combined consumption, 11th of 18 in Tank range, 5th of 18 in 0–100 km/h. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.
- Power
- 204 hp
- 320 Nm
- 0 → 100 km/h
- 6.3 s
- VMax 250 km/h
- Cons.
- 7.2 L
- /100 km
- Tank
- 55 L
Full specifications
Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.
Powertrain
- Displacement
- 1,984 cm³
- Power
- 204 hp
- Couple
- 320 Nm
- Gearbox
- Convertisseur de couple 7 rapports Automatique
- Transmission
- Integrale (AWD)
Consumption
- Cons. WLTP
- 7.2 L/100 km
- Tank
- 55 L
Performance
- 0 → 100 km/h
- 6,3 s
- VMax
- 250 km/h
Dimensions and environment
- Length
- 4,504 mm
- Wheelbase
- 2,618 mm
- Width
- 1,816 mm
- Height
- 1,391 mm
- Boot
- 390 L
- Kerb weight
- 1,455 kg
- Cd
- 0.27
- CO₂ WLTP
- 163 g/km
Caralogy Methodology
Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.
See full methodologyManufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance
Among the 18 compacts, the A3 Sedan ranks (mid-table) in fuel consumption. Caralogy simulates its real-world cost: motorway simulation, consumption simulation and performance simulation.
Tailored to this vehicle?
compact among the best in segment: 5th of 18 in 0–100 km/h (6.3 s).
Frequent urban trips with stop-and-go. At 7,2 L/100 km on the combined cycle, consumption rises in the city without electric assistance. An HEV or PHEV would be more economical for this use profile.
If the priority is Combined consumption, the Audi A3 Sedan (1st with 4.7 L/100) takes the lead. If the priority is Tank range, the Audi A3 Sedan (1st with 957 km) takes the lead.
Fuel consumption: 7.2 L/100 L/100 (12th of 18 in Combined consumption)
The A3 Sedan consumes 7.2 L/100 on the WLTP combined cycle. The segment reference is the Audi A3 Sedan (4.7 L/100).
Tank range: 764 km (11th of 18 in Tank range)
On a full tank, the A3 Sedan covers 764 km on the combined cycle. The segment reference reaches 957 km.
Go beyond this analysis
Recalculate everything for your own profile with the three physics simulators that power this page.
Running cost for your profile
Adjust mileage, driving mix and charging type to estimate your annual energy budget.
Launch simulatorLong-distance trip
Simulate any motorway trip: time, charging stops, total cost.
Simulate a tripTimes & acceleration
0-100, 0-200, speed curve, segment position.
See the performanceWhere the A3 Sedan stands against compacts
Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)
Cross-energy alternatives
Same needs, different powertrain.
The full Audi A3 8Y range
Generation 8Y launched in 2020. Available versions sorted by energy.
Other versions of the 8Y
Popular duels involving the A3 Sedan
Continue with the Audi A3 Sedan
The same car, from other angles.
Audi A3 Sedan: what you need to know
Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.
Where does the A3 Sedan rank in its segment?
Among the 18 compacts 2024–2028, the A3 Sedan ranks 12th of 18 in Combined consumption (7.2 L/100, behind the Audi A3 Sedan), 11th of 18 in Tank range (764 km, behind the Audi A3 Sedan), 5th of 18 in 0–100 km/h (6.3 s, behind the Audi RS 3 Sportback).
What is the range of the A3 Sedan?
764 km on a full tank (7.2 L/100 on the combined cycle) - 11th of 18 in Tank range.
How much does the A3 Sedan cost to run?
Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.
Why not a Audi A3 Sedan instead?
The Audi A3 Sedan leads in Combined consumption (4.7 L/100 vs 7.2 L/100). The choice depends on your priorities: check the A3 Sedan vs Audi A3 Sedan duel for a detailed comparison.
How does Caralogy calculate its figures?
Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.