Among the 107 compacts 2019–2023, the 220i ranks 65th of 103 in Combined consumption (6.0 L/100, behind the Bmw 216d Steptronic), 44th of 95 in Tank range (867 km, behind the Bmw 216d Steptronic), 39th of 107 in 0–100 km/h (7.2 s, behind the BMW M2).
F44 · GENERATION 2021 → · COMPACT
BMWICE
220i
184 hp, 7,2 s 0-100 : among the 107 compacts 2019–2023, the 220i ranks 65th of 103 in Combined consumption, 44th of 95 in Tank range, 39th of 107 in 0–100 km/h. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.
Power
184hp
270 Nm
0 → 100 km/h
7.2s
VMax 230 km/h
Cons.
6.0L
/100 km
Tank
52L
Technical identity card
Full specifications BMW 220i
Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.
Powertrain
| Architecture | 4 cyl. |
| Displacement | 1,998 cm³ |
| Power | 184 hp |
| Couple | 270 Nm |
| Gearbox | Convertisseur de couple 8 rapports Automatique |
| Transmission | Propulsion |
Consumption
| Cons. WLTP | 6.0 L/100km |
| Tank | 52 L |
Performance
| 0 → 100 km/h | 7,2 s |
| VMax | 230 km/h |
Dimensions and environment
| Length | 4,432 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2,690 mm |
| Width | 1,774 mm |
| Height | 1,418 mm |
| Boot | 390 L |
| Kerb weight | 1,440 kg |
| Cd | 0.28 |
| CO₂ WLTP | 136 g/km |
Caralogy Methodology
Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.
See full methodology →Manufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance
Among the 107 compacts, the 220i ranks (mid-table) in fuel consumption. Caralogy simulates its real-world cost: motorway simulation, consumption simulation and performance simulation.
Caralogy Analysis
Tailored to this vehicle?
Fuel consumption: 6.0 L/100 L/100 (65th of 103 in Combined consumption)
The 220i consumes 6.0 L/100 on the WLTP combined cycle. The segment reference is the Bmw 216d Steptronic (3.9 L/100).
Tank range: 867 km (44th of 95 in Tank range)
On a full tank, the 220i covers 867 km on the combined cycle. The segment reference reaches 1308 km.
Go beyond this analysis
Recalculate everything for your own profile with the three physics simulators that power this page.
Running cost for your profile
Adjust mileage, driving mix and charging type to estimate your annual energy budget.
Launch simulator →Long-distance trip
Simulate any motorway trip: time, charging stops, total cost.
Simulate a trip →Chronos & accélération
0-100, 0-200, courbe de vitesse, positionnement segment.
Voir la performance →Segment positioning
Where the 220i stands against compacts
Comparison across 107 compacts marketed between 2019–2023.
Combined consumption65e / 103
6 L/100
Min 10 L/100 · BMW M2Max 3.9 L/100 · Bmw 216d Steptronic
Tank range44e / 95
867 km
Min 520 km · BMW M2Max 1 308 km · Bmw 216d Steptronic
0–100 km/h39e / 107
7,2 s
Min 12,3 s · Hyundai i30 1.5 DPi 110 PSMax 4,1 s · BMW M2
Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)
A3 allstreet204 hp · 0-100 6.4 s
A3 Sedan204 hp · 0-100 6.3 s
A3 Sportback TFSI quattro S tronic 150 kW204 hp · 0-100 6.3 s
A3 allstreet150 hp · 0-100 8.4 s
Cross-energy alternatives
Same needs, different powertrain.
Model family
The full BMW 2 Series F44 range
Generation F44 launched in 2019. Available versions sorted by energy.
Other versions of the F44
Compare
Popular duels involving the 220i
Frequently asked questions
BMW 220i: what you need to know
Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.
867 km on a full tank (6.0 L/100 on the combined cycle) — 44th of 95 in autonomie du segment.
Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.
The Bmw 216d Steptronic leads in Combined consumption (3.9 L/100 vs 6.0 L/100). The choice depends on your priorities: check the 220i vs Bmw 216d Steptronic duel for a detailed comparison.
Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.