216i
109 hp, 11,3 s 0-100 : among the 99 compacts 2016–2020, the 216i ranks 47th of 97 in Combined consumption, 42th of 90 in Tank range, 96th of 99 in 0–100 km/h. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.
Power
109hp
190 Nm
0 → 100 km/h
11.3s
VMax 190 km/h
Cons.
5.8L
/100 km
Tank
51L
Sur cette page
Technical identity card
Full specifications BMW 216i
Manufacturer data and values calibrated by the Caralogy simulation engine.
Powertrain
| Architecture | Unknown · 3 cyl. |
| Displacement | 1,499 cm\u00b3 |
| Power | 109 hp |
| Couple | 190 Nm |
| Gearbox | Manual 6 rapports Manual |
| Transmission | 216i |
Consumption
| Cons. WLTP | 5,8 L/100km |
| Tank | 51 L |
Performance
| 0 → 100 km/h | 11,3 s |
| VMax | 190 km/h |
Dimensions and environment
| Length | 4,354 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2,670 mm |
| Width | 1,800 mm |
| Height | 1,555 mm |
| Boot | 468 L |
| Kerb weight | 1,350 kg |
| Cd | 0.3 |
| CO₂ WLTP | 132 g/km |
Caralogy Methodology
Motorway and performance values calibrated by the Caralogy physics simulation engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves).
See full methodology →Manufacturer data · motorway values calibrated by the Caralogy engine
Among the 99 compacts, the 216i ranks (mid-table) in fuel consumption. Caralogy simulates its real-world cost: motorway simulation, consumption simulation and performance simulation.
Caralogy Analysis · tailored to this vehicle
Caralogy Verdict
Suitable for
Good compromise for regular use without available charging infrastructure.
Less suitable for
Some metrics lag behind the segment. Check the rankings above to identify weak points.
Alternatives to consider
If the priority is Combined consumption, the Bmw 216d Gran Coupe (1st with 4.1 L/100) takes the lead. If the priority is Tank range, the Bmw 116d (1st with 1209 km) takes the lead.
Fuel consumption: 5.8 L/100 L/100 (47th of 97 in Combined consumption)
The 216i consumes 5.8 L/100 on the WLTP combined cycle. The segment reference is the Bmw 216d Gran Coupe (4.1 L/100).
Tank range: 879 km (42th of 90 in Tank range)
On a full tank, the 216i covers 879 km on the combined cycle. The segment reference reaches 1209 km.
Go beyond this analysis
Recalculate everything for your own profile with the three physics simulators that power this page.
Running cost for your profile
Adjust mileage, driving mix and charging type to estimate your annual energy budget.
Launch simulator →Long-distance trip
Simulate any motorway trip: time, charging stops, total cost.
Simulate a trip →Chronos & accélération
0-100, 0-200, courbe de vitesse, positionnement segment.
Voir la performance →Duel against a rival
Calibrated drag race, speed stages, comparative technical analysis.
Start a duel →Segment positioning
Where the 216i stands against compacts
Comparison across 99 compacts marketed between 2016–2020.
Combined consumption
47eout of 97
Tank range
42eout of 90
0–100 km/h
96eout of 99
Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)
A3 Sportback
150 hp · 0-100 8.1 s
A3 Sportback TFSI 110 kW
150 hp · 0-100 8.4 s
A3 allstreet
150 hp · 0-100 8.4 s
A3 Sedan
150 hp · 0-100 8.4 s
Cross-energy alternatives
Same needs, different powertrain.
Compare
Popular duels involving the 216i
Take the next step
Find a 216i or value yours
Caralogy receives no commission on these external links.
Frequently asked questions
BMW 216i: what you need to know
Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.
Among the 99 compacts 2016–2020, the 216i ranks 47th of 97 in Combined consumption (5.8 L/100, behind the Bmw 216d Gran Coupe), 42th of 90 in Tank range (879 km, behind the Bmw 116d), 96th of 99 in 0–100 km/h (11.3 s, behind the Bmw M140i xDrive).
879 km on a full tank (5.8 L/100 on the combined cycle) — 42th of 90 in autonomie du segment.
Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.
The Bmw 216d Gran Coupe leads in Combined consumption (4.1 L/100 vs 5.8 L/100). The choice depends on your priorities: check the 216i vs Bmw 216d Gran Coupe duel for a detailed comparison.
Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.