Among the 18 compacts 2024–2028, the A3 Sportback TFSI 85 kW ranks 8th of 18 in Combined consumption (6.1 L/100, behind the Audi A3 Sedan), 13th of 18 in Tank range (738 km, behind the Audi A3 Sedan), 14th of 18 in 0–100 km/h (9.7 s, behind the Audi RS 3 Sportback).
8Y · GENERATION 2026 → · COMPACT
AudiICE
A3 Sportback TFSI 85 kW
116 hp, 9,7 s 0-100 : among the 18 compacts 2024–2028, the A3 Sportback TFSI 85 kW ranks 8th of 18 in Combined consumption, 13th of 18 in Tank range, 14th of 18 in 0–100 km/h. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.
Power
116hp
220 Nm
0 → 100 km/h
9.7s
VMax 205 km/h
Cons.
6.1L
/100 km
Tank
45L
Technical identity card
Full specifications Audi A3 Sportback TFSI 85 kW
Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.
Powertrain
| Displacement | 1,498 cm³ |
| Power | 116 hp |
| Couple | 220 Nm |
| Gearbox | Manuelle 6 rapports Manuelle |
| Transmission | Traction |
Consumption
| Cons. WLTP | 6.1 L/100km |
| Tank | 45 L |
Performance
| 0 → 100 km/h | 9,7 s |
| VMax | 205 km/h |
Dimensions and environment
| Length | 4,352 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2,618 mm |
| Width | 1,816 mm |
| Height | 1,415 mm |
| Boot | 380 L |
| Kerb weight | 1,285 kg |
| Cd | 0.29 |
| CO₂ WLTP | 138 g/km |
Caralogy Methodology
Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.
See full methodology →Manufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance
Among the 18 compacts, the A3 Sportback TFSI 85 kW ranks (mid-table) in fuel consumption. Caralogy simulates its real-world cost: motorway simulation, consumption simulation and performance simulation.
Caralogy Analysis
Tailored to this vehicle?
Fuel consumption: 6.1 L/100 L/100 (8th of 18 in Combined consumption)
The A3 Sportback TFSI 85 kW consumes 6.1 L/100 on the WLTP combined cycle. The segment reference is the Audi A3 Sedan (4.7 L/100).
Tank range: 738 km (13th of 18 in Tank range)
On a full tank, the A3 Sportback TFSI 85 kW covers 738 km on the combined cycle. The segment reference reaches 957 km.
Go beyond this analysis
Recalculate everything for your own profile with the three physics simulators that power this page.
Running cost for your profile
Adjust mileage, driving mix and charging type to estimate your annual energy budget.
Launch simulator →Long-distance trip
Simulate any motorway trip: time, charging stops, total cost.
Simulate a trip →Chronos & accélération
0-100, 0-200, courbe de vitesse, positionnement segment.
Voir la performance →Segment positioning
Where the A3 Sportback TFSI 85 kW stands against compacts
Comparison across 18 compacts marketed between 2024–2028.
Combined consumption8e / 18
6.1 L/100
Min 9.4 L/100 · Audi RS 3 SportbackMax 4.7 L/100 · Audi A3 Sedan
Tank range13e / 18
738 km
Min 585 km · Audi RS 3 SportbackMax 957 km · Audi A3 Sedan
0–100 km/h14e / 18
9,7 s
Min 10,1 s · Audi A3 SedanMax 3,8 s · Audi RS 3 Sportback
Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)
Cross-energy alternatives
Same needs, different powertrain.
Model family
The full Audi A3 8Y range
Generation 8Y launched in 2020. Available versions sorted by energy.
Other versions of the 8Y
Compare
Popular duels involving the A3 Sportback TFSI 85 kW
Frequently asked questions
Audi A3 Sportback TFSI 85 kW: what you need to know
Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.
738 km on a full tank (6.1 L/100 on the combined cycle) — 13th of 18 in autonomie du segment.
Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.
The Audi A3 Sedan leads in Combined consumption (4.7 L/100 vs 6.1 L/100). The choice depends on your priorities: check the A3 Sportback TFSI 85 kW vs Audi A3 Sedan duel for a detailed comparison.
Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.