F44 · GENERATION 2020 · COMPACT
BMWICE

220d Gran Coupe

190 hp, 7,5 s 0-100 : among the 143 compacts 2018–2022, the 220d Gran Coupe ranks 17th of 137 in Combined consumption, 13th of 130 in Tank range, 70th of 143 in 0–100 km/h. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.

Energy cost · estimate1,47815,000 km · UK mix · home 0,21 £/kWhConsumption →

Power

190hp

400 Nm

0 → 100 km/h

7.5s

VMax 235 km/h

Cons.

4.5L

/100 km

Tank

50L

Technical identity card

Full specifications BMW 220d Gran Coupe

Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.

Powertrain

Architecture4 cyl.
Displacement1,995 cm³
Power190 hp
Couple400 Nm
GearboxConvertisseur de couple 8 rapports Automatique

Consumption

Cons. WLTP4.5 L/100km
Tank50 L

Performance

0 → 100 km/h7,5 s
VMax235 km/h

Dimensions and environment

Length4,526 mm
Wheelbase2,670 mm
Width1,800 mm
Height1,420 mm
Boot430 L
Kerb weight1,505 kg
Cd0.25
CO₂ WLTP120 g/km

Caralogy Methodology

Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.

See full methodology →

Manufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance

Among the 143 compacts, the 220d Gran Coupe ranks (top 17 in segment) in fuel consumption. Caralogy simulates its real-world cost: motorway simulation, consumption simulation and performance simulation.

Caralogy Analysis

Tailored to this vehicle?

Caralogy Verdict
Suitable for

Good compromise for regular use without available charging infrastructure. 17th of 137 in Combined consumption (4.5 L/100), 13th of 130 in Tank range (1111 km).

Alternatives to consider

If the priority is Combined consumption, the Bmw 216d Steptronic (1st with 3.9 L/100) takes the lead. If the priority is Tank range, the Bmw 216d Steptronic (1st with 1308 km) takes the lead.

Fuel consumption: 4.5 L/100 L/100 (17th of 137 in Combined consumption)

The 220d Gran Coupe consumes 4.5 L/100 on the WLTP combined cycle. The segment reference is the Bmw 216d Steptronic (3.9 L/100).

Tank range: 1111 km (13th of 130 in Tank range)

On a full tank, the 220d Gran Coupe covers 1111 km on the combined cycle. The segment reference reaches 1308 km.

Segment positioning

Where the 220d Gran Coupe stands against compacts

Comparison across 143 compacts marketed between 2018–2022.

Combined consumption17e / 137
4.5 L/100
Min 10 L/100 · Bmw M2 CompetitionMax 3.9 L/100 · Bmw 216d Steptronic
Tank range13e / 130
1 111 km
Min 520 km · Bmw M2 CompetitionMax 1 308 km · Bmw 216d Steptronic
0–100 km/h70e / 143
7,5 s
Min 12,3 s · Hyundai i30 1.5 DPi 110 PSMax 4,4 s · Bmw M140i xDrive

Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)

Cross-energy alternatives

Same needs, different powertrain.

Model family

The full BMW 2 Series F44 range

Generation F44 launched in 2019. Available versions sorted by energy.

Other versions of the F44

Compare

Popular duels involving the 220d Gran Coupe

Frequently asked questions

BMW 220d Gran Coupe: what you need to know

Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.

Among the 143 compacts 2018–2022, the 220d Gran Coupe ranks 17th of 137 in Combined consumption (4.5 L/100, behind the Bmw 216d Steptronic), 13th of 130 in Tank range (1111 km, behind the Bmw 216d Steptronic), 70th of 143 in 0–100 km/h (7.5 s, behind the Bmw M140i xDrive).

1111 km on a full tank (4.5 L/100 on the combined cycle) — 13th of 130 in autonomie du segment.

Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.

The Bmw 216d Steptronic leads in Combined consumption (3.9 L/100 vs 4.5 L/100). The choice depends on your priorities: check the 220d Gran Coupe vs Bmw 216d Steptronic duel for a detailed comparison.

Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.