Among the 31 compacts 2022–2026, the 116 ranks 17th of 29 in Combined consumption (6.4 L/100, behind the Audi A3 Sedan), 13th of 26 in Tank range (766 km, behind the Peugeot 308 PureTech 130 EAT8), 25th of 31 in 0–100 km/h (9.8 s, behind the Audi RS 3 Sportback).
F70 · GENERATION 2024 → · COMPACT
BMWICE
116
122 hp, 9,8 s 0-100 : among the 31 compacts 2022–2026, the 116 ranks 17th of 29 in Combined consumption, 13th of 26 in Tank range, 25th of 31 in 0–100 km/h. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.
Power
122hp
230 Nm
0 → 100 km/h
9.8s
VMax 210 km/h
Cons.
6.4L
/100 km
Tank
49L
Technical identity card
Full specifications BMW 116
Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.
Powertrain
| Architecture | 3 cyl. |
| Displacement | 1,499 cm³ |
| Power | 122 hp |
| Couple | 230 Nm |
| Gearbox | Double embrayage 7 rapports Automatique |
Consumption
| Cons. WLTP | 6.4 L/100km |
| Tank | 49 L |
Performance
| 0 → 100 km/h | 9,8 s |
| VMax | 210 km/h |
Dimensions and environment
| Length | 4,361 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2,670 mm |
| Width | 1,800 mm |
| Height | 1,459 mm |
| Boot | 380 L |
| Kerb weight | 1,390 kg |
| Cd | 0.27 |
| CO₂ WLTP | 146 g/km |
Caralogy Methodology
Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.
See full methodology →Manufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance
Among the 31 compacts, the 116 ranks (mid-table) in fuel consumption. Caralogy simulates its real-world cost: motorway simulation, consumption simulation and performance simulation.
Caralogy Analysis
Tailored to this vehicle?
Fuel consumption: 6.4 L/100 L/100 (17th of 29 in Combined consumption)
The 116 consumes 6.4 L/100 on the WLTP combined cycle. The segment reference is the Audi A3 Sedan (4.7 L/100).
Tank range: 766 km (13th of 26 in Tank range)
On a full tank, the 116 covers 766 km on the combined cycle. The segment reference reaches 1000 km.
Go beyond this analysis
Recalculate everything for your own profile with the three physics simulators that power this page.
Running cost for your profile
Adjust mileage, driving mix and charging type to estimate your annual energy budget.
Launch simulator →Long-distance trip
Simulate any motorway trip: time, charging stops, total cost.
Simulate a trip →Chronos & accélération
0-100, 0-200, courbe de vitesse, positionnement segment.
Voir la performance →Segment positioning
Where the 116 stands against compacts
Comparison across 31 compacts marketed between 2022–2026.
Combined consumption17e / 29
6.4 L/100
Min 10 L/100 · BMW M2Max 4.7 L/100 · Audi A3 Sedan
Tank range13e / 26
766 km
Min 520 km · BMW M2Max 1 000 km · Peugeot 308 PureTech 130 EAT8
0–100 km/h25e / 31
9,8 s
Min 11,0 s · Kia Ceed 1.0 T-GDi 120 FWDMax 3,8 s · Audi RS 3 Sportback
Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)
A3 Sedan116 hp · 0-100 9.9 s
A3 Sportback TFSI 85 kW116 hp · 0-100 9.7 s
A3 allstreet150 hp · 0-100 8.4 s
A3 allstreet150 hp · 0-100 8.8 s
Cross-energy alternatives
Same needs, different powertrain.
Model family
The full BMW 1 Series F70 range
Generation F70 launched in 2024. Available versions sorted by energy.
Other versions of the F70
Compare
Popular duels involving the 116
Frequently asked questions
BMW 116: what you need to know
Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.
766 km on a full tank (6.4 L/100 on the combined cycle) - 13th of 26 in autonomie du segment.
Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.
The Audi A3 Sedan leads in Combined consumption (4.7 L/100 vs 6.4 L/100). The choice depends on your priorities: check the 116 vs Audi A3 Sedan duel for a detailed comparison.
Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.