F44 · GENERATION 2021 · COMPACT
BMWICE

220i

178 hp, 7,3 s 0-100 : among the 108 compacts 2019–2023, the 220i ranks 41th of 103 in Combined consumption, 35th of 95 in Tank range, 44th of 108 in 0–100 km/h. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.

Energy cost · estimate1,41915,000 km · UK mix · home UK £/kWhCustomise →

Power

178hp

280 Nm

0 → 100 km/h

7.3s

VMax 229 km/h

Cons.

5.5L

/100 km

Tank

51L

Sur cette page

Technical identity card

Full specifications BMW 220i

Manufacturer data and values calibrated by the Caralogy simulation engine.

Powertrain

ArchitectureUnknown · 4 cyl.
Displacement1,998 cm\u00b3
Power178 hp
Couple280 Nm
GearboxDual Clutch 7 rapports Automatic
Transmission220i

Consumption

Cons. WLTP5,5 L/100km
Tank51 L

Performance

0 → 100 km/h7,3 s
VMax229 km/h

Dimensions and environment

Length4,354 mm
Wheelbase2,670 mm
Width1,800 mm
Height1,555 mm
Boot468 L
Kerb weight1,415 kg
Cd0.28
CO₂ WLTP125 g/km

Caralogy Methodology

Motorway and performance values calibrated by the Caralogy physics simulation engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves).

See full methodology →

Manufacturer data · motorway values calibrated by the Caralogy engine

Among the 108 compacts, the 220i ranks (mid-table) in fuel consumption. Caralogy simulates its real-world cost: motorway simulation, consumption simulation and performance simulation.

Caralogy Analysis · tailored to this vehicle

Caralogy Verdict

Suitable for

Good compromise for regular use without available charging infrastructure.

Alternatives to consider

If the priority is Combined consumption, the Bmw 216d Steptronic (1st with 3.9 L/100) takes the lead. If the priority is Tank range, the Bmw 216d Steptronic (1st with 1308 km) takes the lead.

Fuel consumption: 5.5 L/100 L/100 (41th of 103 in Combined consumption)

The 220i consumes 5.5 L/100 on the WLTP combined cycle. The segment reference is the Bmw 216d Steptronic (3.9 L/100).

Tank range: 927 km (35th of 95 in Tank range)

On a full tank, the 220i covers 927 km on the combined cycle. The segment reference reaches 1308 km.

Segment positioning

Where the 220i stands against compacts

Comparison across 108 compacts marketed between 2019–2023.

Combined consumption

41eout of 103

5.5 L/100
Min10 L/100 · BMW M2
Max3.9 L/100 · Bmw 216d Steptronic

Tank range

35eout of 95

927 km
Min520 km · BMW M2
Max1 308 km · Bmw 216d Steptronic

0–100 km/h

44eout of 108

7,3 s
Min12,3 s · Hyundai i30 1.5 DPi 110 PS
Max4,1 s · BMW M2

Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)

Cross-energy alternatives

Same needs, different powertrain.

Model family

The full BMW 2 Series F44 range

Generation F44 launched in 2019. Available versions sorted by energy.

Other versions of the F44

Compare

Popular duels involving the 220i

Take the next step

Find a 220i or value yours

Caralogy receives no commission on these external links.

Frequently asked questions

BMW 220i: what you need to know

Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.

Where does the 220i rank in its segment?#

Among the 108 compacts 2019–2023, the 220i ranks 41th of 103 in Combined consumption (5.5 L/100, behind the Bmw 216d Steptronic), 35th of 95 in Tank range (927 km, behind the Bmw 216d Steptronic), 44th of 108 in 0–100 km/h (7.3 s, behind the BMW M2).

What is the range of the 220i?#

927 km on a full tank (5.5 L/100 on the combined cycle) — 35th of 95 in autonomie du segment.

How much does the 220i cost to run?#

Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.

Why not a Bmw 216d Steptronic instead?#

The Bmw 216d Steptronic leads in Combined consumption (3.9 L/100 vs 5.5 L/100). The choice depends on your priorities: check the 220i vs Bmw 216d Steptronic duel for a detailed comparison.

How does Caralogy calculate its figures?#

Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.