F70 · GENERATION 2024 · COMPACT
BMWMHEV

123 xDrive

218 hp, 6,3 s 0-100 : among the 17 compacts hybrid 2022–2026, the 123 xDrive ranks 16th of 16 in Combined consumption, 15th of 15 in Tank range, 1st of 17 in 0–100 km/h. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.

Energy cost · estimate1,93915,000 km · UK mix · home 0,21 £/kWhConsumption →

Power

218hp

320 Nm · 20 hp elec

0 → 100 km/h

6.3s

VMax 246 km/h

Cons.

6.4L

/100 km

Tank

49L

Technical identity card

Full specifications BMW 123 xDrive

Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.

Powertrain

Architecture4 cyl.
Displacement1,998 cm³
Puissance électrique20 hp
Combined power218 hp
Couple320 Nm
GearboxDouble embrayage 7 rapports Automatique
TransmissionIntegrale (AWD)

Consumption

Cons. WLTP6.4 L/100km
Tank49 L

Performance

0 → 100 km/h6,3 s
VMax246 km/h

Dimensions and environment

Length4,361 mm
Wheelbase2,670 mm
Width1,800 mm
Height1,459 mm
Boot300 L
Kerb weight1,530 kg
Cd0.27
CO₂ WLTP134 g/km

Caralogy Methodology

Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.

See full methodology →

Manufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance

Among the 17 compacts hybrid, the 123 xDrive ranks (last in segment) in fuel consumption. Caralogy simulates its real-world cost: motorway simulation, consumption simulation and performance simulation.

Caralogy Analysis

Tailored to this vehicle?

Caralogy Verdict
Suitable for

Optimised urban and peri-urban trips with no charging to manage. 1st of 17 in 0–100 km/h (6.3 s).

Less suitable for

Home charging access not leveraged. If you have a dedicated outlet, a PHEV would allow daily commutes in pure electric mode.

Alternatives to consider

If the priority is Combined consumption, the Honda Civic e:HEV (1st with 4.7 L/100) takes the lead. If the priority is Tank range, the Ford Focus EcoBoost MHEV 125 (1st with 963 km) takes the lead.

Fuel consumption: 6.4 L/100 L/100 (16th of 16 in Combined consumption)

The 123 xDrive consumes 6.4 L/100 on the WLTP combined cycle. The segment reference is the Honda Civic e:HEV (4.7 L/100).

Tank range: 766 km (15th of 15 in Tank range)

On a full tank, the 123 xDrive covers 766 km on the combined cycle. The segment reference reaches 963 km.

Segment positioning

Where the 123 xDrive stands against compacts hybrid

Comparison across 17 compacts hybrid marketed between 2022–2026.

Combined consumption16e / 16
6.4 L/100
Min 6.4 L/100 · Bmw 123 xDriveMax 4.7 L/100 · Honda Civic e:HEV
Tank range15e / 15
766 km
Min 766 km · Bmw 123 xDriveMax 963 km · Ford Focus EcoBoost MHEV 125
0–100 km/h1e / 17
6,3 s
Min 10,2 s · Ford Focus EcoBoost MHEV 125Max 6,3 s · Bmw 123 xDrive

Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)

Cross-energy alternatives

Same needs, different powertrain.

Model family

The full BMW 1 Series F70 range

Generation F70 launched in 2024. Available versions sorted by energy.

Other versions of the F70

Compare

Popular duels involving the 123 xDrive

Frequently asked questions

BMW 123 xDrive: what you need to know

Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.

Among the 17 compacts hybrid 2022–2026, the 123 xDrive ranks 16th of 16 in Combined consumption (6.4 L/100, behind the Honda Civic e:HEV), 15th of 15 in Tank range (766 km, behind the Ford Focus EcoBoost MHEV 125), 1st of 17 in 0–100 km/h (6.3 s, behind the Bmw 123 xDrive).

766 km on a full tank (6.4 L/100 on the combined cycle) - 15th of 15 in autonomie du segment.

Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.

The Honda Civic e:HEV leads in Combined consumption (4.7 L/100 vs 6.4 L/100). The choice depends on your priorities: check the 123 xDrive vs Honda Civic e:HEV duel for a detailed comparison.

Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.