Among the 17 compacts hybrid 2022–2026, the 123 xDrive ranks 16th of 16 in Combined consumption (6.4 L/100, behind the Honda Civic e:HEV), 15th of 15 in Tank range (766 km, behind the Ford Focus EcoBoost MHEV 125), 1st of 17 in 0–100 km/h (6.3 s, behind the Bmw 123 xDrive).
123 xDrive
218 hp, 6,3 s 0-100 : among the 17 compacts hybrid 2022–2026, the 123 xDrive ranks 16th of 16 in Combined consumption, 15th of 15 in Tank range, 1st of 17 in 0–100 km/h. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.
Power
218hp
320 Nm · 20 hp elec
0 → 100 km/h
6.3s
VMax 246 km/h
Cons.
6.4L
/100 km
Tank
49L
Full specifications BMW 123 xDrive
Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.
Powertrain
| Architecture | 4 cyl. |
| Displacement | 1,998 cm³ |
| Puissance électrique | 20 hp |
| Combined power | 218 hp |
| Couple | 320 Nm |
| Gearbox | Double embrayage 7 rapports Automatique |
| Transmission | Integrale (AWD) |
Consumption
| Cons. WLTP | 6.4 L/100km |
| Tank | 49 L |
Performance
| 0 → 100 km/h | 6,3 s |
| VMax | 246 km/h |
Dimensions and environment
| Length | 4,361 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2,670 mm |
| Width | 1,800 mm |
| Height | 1,459 mm |
| Boot | 300 L |
| Kerb weight | 1,530 kg |
| Cd | 0.27 |
| CO₂ WLTP | 134 g/km |
Caralogy Methodology
Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.
See full methodology →Manufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance
Among the 17 compacts hybrid, the 123 xDrive ranks (last in segment) in fuel consumption. Caralogy simulates its real-world cost: motorway simulation, consumption simulation and performance simulation.
Tailored to this vehicle?
Optimised urban and peri-urban trips with no charging to manage. 1st of 17 in 0–100 km/h (6.3 s).
Home charging access not leveraged. If you have a dedicated outlet, a PHEV would allow daily commutes in pure electric mode.
If the priority is Combined consumption, the Honda Civic e:HEV (1st with 4.7 L/100) takes the lead. If the priority is Tank range, the Ford Focus EcoBoost MHEV 125 (1st with 963 km) takes the lead.
Fuel consumption: 6.4 L/100 L/100 (16th of 16 in Combined consumption)
The 123 xDrive consumes 6.4 L/100 on the WLTP combined cycle. The segment reference is the Honda Civic e:HEV (4.7 L/100).
Tank range: 766 km (15th of 15 in Tank range)
On a full tank, the 123 xDrive covers 766 km on the combined cycle. The segment reference reaches 963 km.
Recalculate everything for your own profile with the three physics simulators that power this page.
Running cost for your profile
Adjust mileage, driving mix and charging type to estimate your annual energy budget.
Launch simulator →Long-distance trip
Simulate any motorway trip: time, charging stops, total cost.
Simulate a trip →Chronos & accélération
0-100, 0-200, courbe de vitesse, positionnement segment.
Voir la performance →Where the 123 xDrive stands against compacts hybrid
Comparison across 17 compacts hybrid marketed between 2022–2026.
Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)
Cross-energy alternatives
Same needs, different powertrain.
The full BMW 1 Series F70 range
Generation F70 launched in 2024. Available versions sorted by energy.
Other versions of the F70
Popular duels involving the 123 xDrive
BMW 123 xDrive: what you need to know
Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.
766 km on a full tank (6.4 L/100 on the combined cycle) - 15th of 15 in autonomie du segment.
Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.
The Honda Civic e:HEV leads in Combined consumption (4.7 L/100 vs 6.4 L/100). The choice depends on your priorities: check the 123 xDrive vs Honda Civic e:HEV duel for a detailed comparison.
Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.