Among the 23 grand tourers hybrid 2018–2022, the 630d Gran Turismo ranks 6th of 23 in Combined consumption (5.0 L/100, behind the BMW 520d Touring), 6th of 23 in Tank range (1320 km, behind the BMW 520d Touring), 13th of 23 in 0–100 km/h (6.1 s, behind the BMW 540d xDrive Touring).
BMW 630d Gran Turismo
286 hp, 6,1 s 0-100 : among the 23 grand tourers hybrid 2018–2022, the 630d Gran Turismo ranks 6th of 23 in Combined consumption, 6th of 23 in Tank range, 13th of 23 in 0–100 km/h. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.
Power
286hp
650 Nm, dont 11 hp elec
0 → 100 km/h
6.1s
VMax 250 km/h
Cons.
5.0L
/100 km
Tank
66L
Full specifications
Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.
Powertrain
- Architecture
- 6 cyl.
- Displacement
- 2,993 cm³
- Puissance électrique
- 11 hp
- Combined power
- 286 hp
- Couple
- 650 Nm
- Gearbox
- Convertisseur de couple 8 rapports Automatique
Consumption
- Cons. WLTP
- 5.0 L/100 km
- Tank
- 66 L
Performance
- 0 → 100 km/h
- 6,1 s
- VMax
- 250 km/h
Dimensions and environment
- Length
- 5,091 mm
- Wheelbase
- 3,070 mm
- Width
- 1,902 mm
- Height
- 1,538 mm
- Boot
- 600 L
- Kerb weight
- 1,930 kg
- Cd
- 0.25
- CO₂ WLTP
- 133 g/km
Caralogy Methodology
Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.
See full methodologyManufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance
Among the 23 grand tourers hybrid, the 630d Gran Turismo ranks (top 6 in segment) in fuel consumption. Caralogy simulates its real-world cost: motorway simulation, consumption simulation and performance simulation.
Tailored to this vehicle?
Optimised urban and peri-urban trips with no charging to manage. 6th of 23 in Combined consumption (5.0 L/100), 6th of 23 in Tank range (1320 km).
If the priority is Combined consumption, the BMW 520d Touring (1st with 4.5 L/100) takes the lead. If the priority is Tank range, the BMW 520d Touring (1st with 1467 km) takes the lead.
Fuel consumption: 5.0 L/100 L/100 (6th of 23 in Combined consumption)
The 630d Gran Turismo consumes 5.0 L/100 on the WLTP combined cycle. The segment reference is the BMW 520d Touring (4.5 L/100).
Tank range: 1320 km (6th of 23 in Tank range)
On a full tank, the 630d Gran Turismo covers 1320 km on the combined cycle. The segment reference reaches 1467 km.
Go beyond this analysis
Recalculate everything for your own profile with the three physics simulators that power this page.
Running cost for your profile
Adjust mileage, driving mix and charging type to estimate your annual energy budget.
Launch simulatorLong-distance trip
Simulate any motorway trip: time, charging stops, total cost.
Simulate a tripChronos & accélération
0-100, 0-200, courbe de vitesse, positionnement segment.
Voir la performanceWhere the 630d Gran Turismo stands against grand tourers hybrid
Comparison across 23 grand tourers hybrid marketed between 2018–2022.
Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)
Cross-energy alternatives
Same needs, different powertrain.
The full BMW 6 Series G32 range
Generation G32 launched in 2017. Available versions sorted by energy.
Other versions of the G32
Popular duels involving the 630d Gran Turismo
BMW 630d Gran Turismo: what you need to know
Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.
1320 km on a full tank (5.0 L/100 on the combined cycle) - 6th of 23 in autonomie du segment.
Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.
The BMW 520d Touring leads in Combined consumption (4.5 L/100 vs 5.0 L/100). The choice depends on your priorities: check the 630d Gran Turismo vs BMW 520d Touring duel for a detailed comparison.
Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.