Audi A6 Avant
204 hp, 7,0 s 0-100 : among the 17 grand tourers 2024–2028, the A6 Avant ranks 7th of 17 in Combined consumption, 4th of 11 in Tank range, 9th of 17 in 0–100 km/h. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.
- Power
- 204 hp
- 400 Nm
- 0 → 100 km/h
- 7.0 s
- VMax 238 km/h
- Cons.
- 5.9 L
- /100 km
- Tank
- 60 L
Full specifications
Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.
Powertrain
- Displacement
- 1,968 cm³
- Power
- 204 hp
- Couple
- 400 Nm
- Gearbox
- Convertisseur de couple 7 rapports Automatique
- Transmission
- Integrale (AWD)
Consumption
- Cons. WLTP
- 5.9 L/100 km
- Tank
- 60 L
Performance
- 0 → 100 km/h
- 7,0 s
- VMax
- 238 km/h
Dimensions and environment
- Length
- 4,999 mm
- Wheelbase
- 2,927 mm
- Width
- 1,875 mm
- Height
- 1,439 mm
- Boot
- 466 L
- Kerb weight
- 2,000 kg
- Cd
- 0.26
- CO₂ WLTP
- 155 g/km
Caralogy Methodology
Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.
See full methodologyManufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance
Among the 17 grand tourers, the A6 Avant ranks (mid-table) in fuel consumption. Caralogy simulates its real-world cost: motorway simulation, consumption simulation and performance simulation.
Tailored to this vehicle?
Good compromise for regular use without available charging infrastructure. 4th of 11 in Tank range (1017 km).
If the priority is Combined consumption, the Mercedes E 220 d (1st with 5.4 L/100) takes the lead. If the priority is Tank range, the Audi A6 Sedan (1st with 1071 km) takes the lead.
Fuel consumption: 5.9 L/100 L/100 (7th of 17 in Combined consumption)
The A6 Avant consumes 5.9 L/100 on the WLTP combined cycle. The segment reference is the Mercedes E 220 d (5.4 L/100).
Tank range: 1017 km (4th of 11 in Tank range)
On a full tank, the A6 Avant covers 1017 km on the combined cycle. The segment reference reaches 1071 km.
Go beyond this analysis
Recalculate everything for your own profile with the three physics simulators that power this page.
Running cost for your profile
Adjust mileage, driving mix and charging type to estimate your annual energy budget.
Launch simulatorLong-distance trip
Simulate any motorway trip: time, charging stops, total cost.
Simulate a tripTimes & acceleration
0-100, 0-200, speed curve, segment position.
See the performanceWhere the A6 Avant stands against grand tourers
Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)
Cross-energy alternatives
Same needs, different powertrain.
The full Audi A6 C8 range
Generation C8 launched in 2018. Available versions sorted by energy.
Other versions of the C8
Popular duels involving the A6 Avant
Continue with the Audi A6 Avant
The same car, from other angles.
Audi A6 Avant: what you need to know
Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.
Where does the A6 Avant rank in its segment?
Among the 17 grand tourers 2024–2028, the A6 Avant ranks 7th of 17 in Combined consumption (5.9 L/100, behind the Mercedes E 220 d), 4th of 11 in Tank range (1017 km, behind the Audi A6 Sedan), 9th of 17 in 0–100 km/h (7.0 s, behind the Audi A6 Sedan TFSI quattro S tronic 270 kW).
What is the range of the A6 Avant?
1017 km on a full tank (5.9 L/100 on the combined cycle) - 4th of 11 in Tank range.
How much does the A6 Avant cost to run?
Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.
Why not a Mercedes E 220 d instead?
The Mercedes E 220 d leads in Combined consumption (5.4 L/100 vs 5.9 L/100). The choice depends on your priorities: check the A6 Avant vs Mercedes E 220 d duel for a detailed comparison.
How does Caralogy calculate its figures?
Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.