Skip to main content
CaralogyCaralogy
HomeBrandsRoad TripBudgetDuelGuides
Caralogy

The car comparison platform. Physics simulation, road trips, real costs.

Navigation
All brandsCar duelRunning costsMotorwayMethodology
Simulators
Motorway simulatorRunning costsPerformance duel
Brands
VolkswagenBMWMercedesToyotaTeslaAudi
FRENDEESIT
© 2026 Caralogy · All rights reserved
  1. Home
  2. /Consumption
  3. /Sedans
GiuliaPetrolvs216dDiesel
  • MotorwayMotorwayRange and charging
  • PerformancePerformance0-100, top speed
  • ConsumptionConsumptionYearly cost
  • SpecsGiulia · 216d

Alfa Romeo Giulia Quadrifoglio vs BMW 216d Active Tourer F44: which is cheaper to run?

What each kilometre costs, depending on your driving profile and how you charge. Annual projection and cumulative savings over 10 years.

saloon · 2024 vs 2020 · 15,000 km/an · Mixed · Petrol 95 2.17 €/L · Diesel 2.38 €/L · Methodology
Annual mileage
15,000 km
5,000 km50,000 km
Driving mix

30 % City · 50 % Road · 20 % Motorway

Fuel price
Petrol 95 2.17 €/L · Diesel 2.38 €/Lprix-carburants.gouv.fr — moyenne nationale du 05/10/2026 ; EDF Tarif Bleu Base au 01/08/2026 ; DC autoroute : moyenne des réseaux sans abonnement

Result · yearly energy cost

AAlfa Romeo Giulia Quadrifoglio

3,061 €per year

9,4 L/100 km weighted · 20.41 € per 100 km · 1 411 L per year

Gap1,611 € per yearin favour of the 216d Active Tourer (−53 %)≈ 742 L petrol 95
BBMW 216d Active Tourer F44

1,451 €per year

4,1 L/100 km weighted · 9.67 € per 100 km · 610 L per year

The verdict changes with your usage
ProfileSplitAA · GiuliaBB · 216dGap
City70 / 25 / 570 % city · 25 % road · 5 % motorway3,420 €1,543 €1,877 € · 216d
Mixed30 / 50 / 2030 % city · 50 % road · 20 % motorway3,061 €1,451 €1,611 € · 216d
Long-distance10 / 40 / 5010 % city · 40 % road · 50 % motorway2,783 €1,372 €1,411 € · 216d

Cumulative saving for the 216d Active Tourer

1 year
1,611 €
3 years
4,832 €
5 years
8,054 €
10 years
16,108 €

Energy only. Excludes purchase, insurance, servicing, depreciation.

What produces these figures

WLTP combined
9.0 L/100 km · 4.0 L/100 km
Powertrain
Combustion · Combustion
Power
510 ch · 116 ch
Kerb weight
1,580 kg · 1,420 kg

Other similar comparisons

AlfaVSBMW

Romeo Giulia Quadrifoglio vs M3 Competition

gap 692 €/year
MercedesVSBMW

V 300 d 4MATIC (long) vs 216d Active Tourer

gap 2 386 €/year
AlfaVSBMW

Romeo Giulia Quadrifoglio vs M3 Competition Sedan

gap 692 €/year
BMWVSCitroen

216d Active Tourer vs Berlingo PureTech 110 FWD

gap 861 €/year

Frequently asked questions

On a 100 km mixed trip, the BMW 216d Active Tourer is about 55% cheaper than the Alfa Romeo Giulia Quadrifoglio with default parameters. This ratio shifts with your actual energy prices - simulate for your profile.

The BMW 216d Active Tourer is cheaper across all distances with default rates. If your energy prices differ significantly, simulate to see the real impact on your budget.