F44 · GENERATION 2020 · MPV
BMWICE

216d Active Tourer

116 hp, 11,1 s 0-100 : among the 37 M 2018–2022, the 216d Active Tourer ranks 1st of 37 in Combined consumption, 1st of 37 in Tank range, 29th of 37 in 0–100 km/h. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.

Energy cost · estimate1,03215,000 km · UK mix · home UK £/kWhCustomise →

Power

116hp

270 Nm

0 → 100 km/h

11.1s

VMax 195 km/h

Cons.

4.0L

/100 km

Tank

51L

Sur cette page

Technical identity card

Full specifications BMW 216d Active Tourer

Manufacturer data and values calibrated by the Caralogy simulation engine.

Powertrain

ArchitectureUnknown · 3 cyl.
Displacement1,496 cm\u00b3
Power116 hp
Couple270 Nm
GearboxDual Clutch 6 rapports Automatic
Transmission216d Active Tourer

Consumption

Cons. WLTP4,0 L/100km
Tank51 L

Performance

0 → 100 km/h11,1 s
VMax195 km/h

Dimensions and environment

Length4,354 mm
Wheelbase2,670 mm
Width1,800 mm
Height1,555 mm
Boot468 L
Kerb weight1,420 kg
Cd0.27
CO₂ WLTP104 g/km

Caralogy Methodology

Motorway and performance values calibrated by the Caralogy physics simulation engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves).

See full methodology →

Manufacturer data · motorway values calibrated by the Caralogy engine

Among the 37 M, the 216d Active Tourer ranks (best in segment) in fuel consumption. Caralogy simulates its real-world cost: motorway simulation, consumption simulation and performance simulation.

Caralogy Analysis · tailored to this vehicle

Caralogy Verdict

Suitable for

Good compromise for regular use without available charging infrastructure. 1st of 37 in Combined consumption (4.0 L/100), 1st of 37 in Tank range (1275 km).

Less suitable for

Some metrics lag behind the segment. Check the rankings above to identify weak points.

Alternatives to consider

If the priority is 0–100 km/h, the Bmw 225i xDrive Active Tourer (1st with 6.5 s) takes the lead.

Fuel consumption: 4.0 L/100 L/100 (1st of 37 in Combined consumption)

The 216d Active Tourer consumes 4.0 L/100 on the WLTP combined cycle. The segment reference is the Bmw 216d Active Tourer (4.0 L/100).

Tank range: 1275 km (1st of 37 in Tank range)

On a full tank, the 216d Active Tourer covers 1275 km on the combined cycle. The segment reference reaches 1275 km.

Segment positioning

Where the 216d Active Tourer stands against M

Comparison across 37 M marketed between 2018–2022.

Combined consumption

1eout of 37

4 L/100
Min6.7 L/100 · Bmw 216i Active Tourer
Max4 L/100 · Bmw 216d Active Tourer

Tank range

1eout of 37

1 275 km
Min672 km · Bmw 216i Active Tourer
Max1 275 km · Bmw 216d Active Tourer

0–100 km/h

29eout of 37

11,1 s
Min11,7 s · Bmw 216i Gran Tourer
Max6,5 s · Bmw 225i xDrive Active Tourer

Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)

Cross-energy alternatives

Same needs, different powertrain.

Model family

The full BMW 2 Series F44 range

Generation F44 launched in 2019. Available versions sorted by energy.

Other versions of the F44

Compare

Popular duels involving the 216d Active Tourer

Take the next step

Find a 216d Active Tourer or value yours

Caralogy receives no commission on these external links.

Frequently asked questions

BMW 216d Active Tourer: what you need to know

Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.

Where does the 216d Active Tourer rank in its segment?#

Among the 37 M 2018–2022, the 216d Active Tourer ranks 1st of 37 in Combined consumption (4.0 L/100, behind the Bmw 216d Active Tourer), 1st of 37 in Tank range (1275 km, behind the Bmw 216d Active Tourer), 29th of 37 in 0–100 km/h (11.1 s, behind the Bmw 225i xDrive Active Tourer).

What is the range of the 216d Active Tourer?#

1275 km on a full tank (4.0 L/100 on the combined cycle) — 1st of 37 in autonomie du segment.

How much does the 216d Active Tourer cost to run?#

Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.

How does Caralogy calculate its figures?#

Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.