Alfa Romeo Giulia Quadrifoglio
510 hp, 3,9 s 0-100 : among the 14 saloons 2022–2026, the Giulia Quadrifoglio ranks 4th of 14 in 0–100 km/h, 1st of 14 in Top speed, 1st of 14 in Power-to-weight. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.
- Power
- 510 hp
- 600 Nm
- 0 → 100 km/h
- 3.9 s
- VMax 307 km/h
- Cons.
- 9.0 L
- /100 km
- Tank
- 58 L
Full specifications
Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.
Powertrain
- Displacement
- 2,891 cm³
- Power
- 510 hp
- Couple
- 600 Nm
- Gearbox
- Convertisseur de couple 8 rapports Automatique
Consumption
- Cons. WLTP
- 9.0 L/100 km
- Tank
- 58 L
Performance
- 0 → 100 km/h
- 3,9 s
- VMax
- 307 km/h
Dimensions and environment
- Length
- 4,650 mm
- Width
- 1,860 mm
- Height
- 1,436 mm
- Kerb weight
- 1,580 kg
- Cd
- 0.24
Caralogy Methodology
Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.
See full methodologyManufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance
Among the 14 saloons, the Giulia Quadrifoglio ranks (top 4 in segment) in acceleration. Caralogy simulates its real-world performance: motorway simulation, performance simulation and consumption simulation.
Tailored to this vehicle?
Demanding drivers: 4th of 14 in 0–100 km/h (3.9 s), 1st of 14 in Top speed (307 km/h), 1st of 14 in Power-to-weight (323 hp/t). 4th of 14 in 0–100 km/h (3.9 s), 1st of 14 in Top speed (307 km/h), 1st of 14 in Power-to-weight (323 hp/t).
Frequent urban trips with stop-and-go. At 9,0 L/100 km on the combined cycle, consumption rises in the city without electric assistance. An HEV or PHEV would be more economical for this use profile.
If the priority is 0–100 km/h, the BMW M4 Competition M xDrive (1st with 3.5 s) takes the lead.
Acceleration: 3.9 s 0-100 (4th of 14 in 0–100 km/h)
In pure acceleration, the Giulia Quadrifoglio ranks 4th of 14 in 0–100 km/h, 0.4 s off the reference BMW M4 Competition M xDrive (3.5 s).
Top speed: 307 km/h (1st of 14 in Top speed)
Top speed of 307 km/h. The segment reference reaches 307 km/h.
Go beyond this analysis
Recalculate everything for your own profile with the three physics simulators that power this page.
Running cost for your profile
Adjust mileage, driving mix and charging type to estimate your annual energy budget.
Launch simulatorLong-distance trip
Simulate any motorway trip: time, charging stops, total cost.
Simulate a tripTimes & acceleration
0-100, 0-200, speed curve, segment position.
See the performanceWhere the Giulia Quadrifoglio stands against saloons
Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)
Cross-energy alternatives
Same needs, different powertrain.
Popular duels involving the Giulia Quadrifoglio
Continue with the Alfa Romeo Giulia Quadrifoglio
The same car, from other angles.
Alfa Romeo Giulia Quadrifoglio: what you need to know
Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.
Where does the Giulia Quadrifoglio rank in its segment?
Among the 14 saloons 2022–2026, the Giulia Quadrifoglio ranks 4th of 14 in 0–100 km/h (3.9 s, behind the BMW M4 Competition M xDrive), 1st of 14 in Top speed (307 km/h, behind the Alfa Romeo Giulia Quadrifoglio), 1st of 14 in Power-to-weight (323 hp/t, behind the Alfa Romeo Giulia Quadrifoglio).
How much does the Giulia Quadrifoglio cost to run?
Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.
Why not a BMW M4 Competition M xDrive instead?
The BMW M4 Competition M xDrive leads in 0–100 km/h (3.5 s vs 3.9 s). The choice depends on your priorities: check the Giulia Quadrifoglio vs BMW M4 Competition M xDrive duel for a detailed comparison.
How does Caralogy calculate its figures?
Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.