Skip to main content
CaralogyCaralogy
HomeBrandsRoad TripBudgetDuelGuides
Caralogy

The car comparison platform. Physics simulation, road trips, real costs.

Navigation
All brandsCar duelRunning costsMotorwayMethodology
Simulators
Motorway simulatorRunning costsPerformance duel
Brands
VolkswagenBMWMercedesToyotaTeslaAudi
FRENDEESIT
© 2026 Caralogy · All rights reserved
  1. Home
  2. /Consumption
  3. /Sedans
e-tronBEVvs320ePHEV
  • MotorwayMotorwayRange and charging
  • PerformancePerformance0-100, top speed
  • ConsumptionConsumptionYearly cost
  • Specs

Audi e-tron GT quattro vs BMW 320e G20: which is cheaper to run?

What each kilometre costs, depending on your driving profile, how you charge and the share of the trip driven on electricity or fuel.

grand tourer · 2026 vs 2021 · 15,000 km/an · Mixed · Petrol 95 2.17 €/L · Home 0.20 €/kWh · Methodology
Annual mileage
15,000 km
5,000 km50,000 km
Driving mix

30 % City · 50 % Road · 20 % Motorway

Fuel price
Petrol 95 2.17 €/L · Diesel 2.38 €/Lprix-carburants.gouv.fr — moyenne nationale du 05/10/2026 ; EDF Tarif Bleu Base au 01/08/2026 ; DC autoroute : moyenne des réseaux sans abonnement
Charging type

Result · yearly energy cost

AAudi e-tron GT quattro

381 €per year

12,7 kWh/100 km weighted · 2.54 € per 100 km · 1 903 kWh per year

Gap549 € per yearin favour of the e-tron GT quattro (−59 %)≈ 253 L petrol 95
BBMW 320e G20

930 €per year

15,4 kWh/100 km weighted · 6.20 € per 100 km · 1 254 L per year

The verdict changes with your usage
ProfileSplitAA · e-tronBB · 320eGap
City70 / 25 / 570 % city · 25 % road · 5 % motorway324 €930 €606 € · e-tron
Mixed30 / 50 / 2030 % city · 50 % road · 20 % motorway381 €930 €549 € · e-tron
Long-distance10 / 40 / 5010 % city · 40 % road · 50 % motorway450 €930 €480 € · e-tron

Cumulative saving for the e-tron GT quattro

1 year
549 €
3 years
1,648 €
5 years
2,747 €
10 years
5,493 €

Energy only. Excludes purchase, insurance, servicing, depreciation.

What produces these figures

WLTP combined
12.2 L/100 km · 14.8 kWh/100 km
Powertrain
Fully electric · Plug-in hybrid
Power
577 ch · 204 ch
Kerb weight
2,280 kg · 1,765 kg

Other similar comparisons

PorscheVSAudi

Taycan GTS vs e-tron GT quattro

gap 406 €/year
VolvoVSBMW

V60 B5 AWD Geartronic vs 320e

gap 2 006 €/year
PorscheVSAudi

Taycan GTS Sport Turismo vs e-tron GT quattro

gap 436 €/year
AudiVSBMW

A5 Avant e-hybrid quattro 220 kW vs 320e

Frequently asked questions

On a 100 km mixed trip, the Audi e-tron GT quattro is about 60% cheaper than the BMW 320e with default parameters. This ratio shifts with your actual energy prices - simulate for your profile.

Audi e-tron GT quattro offers more range: 574 km vs 52 km for BMW 320e (WLTP/EPA). In real motorway use, expect 10-20% less depending on temperature.

The Audi e-tron GT quattro is cheaper across all distances with default rates. If your energy prices differ significantly, simulate to see the real impact on your budget.

e-tron
· 320e