Annual gap 216d Active Tourer vs 740Le xDrive iPerformance+8 €/an≈ 4 L petrol 95
BMW 216d Active Tourer F44 costs 8 €/an less in energy than BMW 740Le xDrive iPerformance G11, over 15 000 kmwith home for this driving mix.
≈ 4 L of petrol 95 saved per year
By charging mix:
Home+8 €/an
AC station+8 €/an
Fast DC+8 €/an
Your savings over the ownership period
Cumulative projection by annual mileage. The cheaper-to-run vehicle widens the gap year after year.
Annual mileage
15 000 km/an
1 year
8 €
≈ 4 L petrol 95
3 years
25 €
≈ 12 L petrol 95
5 years
42 €
≈ 21 L petrol 95
10 years
83 €
≈ 41 L petrol 95
Cumulative savings for BMW 216d Active Tourer F44 versus BMW 740Le xDrive iPerformance G11. Excluding purchase, insurance, maintenance and depreciation.
Annual cost breakdown by charging mix
Projection over 15 000 km/year, by proportion of each charging type.
On a 100 km mixed trip, the BMW 740Le xDrive iPerformance and BMW 216d Active Tourer have a near-identical cost per km with default parameters. The gap becomes significant once you enter your actual energy prices.
The declared range of the BMW 740Le xDrive iPerformance is 38 km (WLTP/EPA). In real-world conditions, expect 10-20% less.
The BMW 216d Active Tourer is cheaper across all distances with default rates. If your energy prices differ significantly, simulate to see the real impact on your budget.