BMWPetrol
X5 M50d F15
Annual energy cost · 15 000 km
1 935€
12,90 € / 100 km
Equivalent to 972 L of petrol 95 per year
- Weighted consumption
- 7,4 L/100km
- Fuel price
- 1,75 €/L
- Fuel used
- 1105,5 L per year
Consumption comparison
Same car, two powertrains. The simulator below calculates the gap based on your mileage and charging type.
Annual mileage
15 000 km/an
Simulated driving mix
Drag anywhere on the bar to adjust
Fuel price
Petrol 95 : 1,99 €/L·Diesel : 1,75 €/L
Typical annual usage : Mix 30% city / 50% road / 20% motorway
Annual energy cost · 15 000 km
12,90 € / 100 km
Equivalent to 972 L of petrol 95 per year
Annual energy cost · 15 000 km
12,50 € / 100 km
Equivalent to 942 L of petrol 95 per year
Ford Puma ST 200 costs 60 €/an less in energy than BMW X5 M50d F15, over 15 000 km for this driving mix.
≈ 34 L of diesel saved per year
Cumulative projection by annual mileage. The cheaper-to-run vehicle widens the gap year after year.
1 year
60 €
≈ 30 L petrol 95
3 years
180 €
≈ 91 L petrol 95
5 years
300 €
≈ 151 L petrol 95
10 years
600 €
≈ 302 L petrol 95
Cumulative savings for Ford Puma ST 200 versus BMW X5 M50d F15. Excluding purchase, insurance, maintenance and depreciation.
Projection over 15 000 km/year.
| Fuel | km/year | €/km | Annual cost |
|---|---|---|---|
| Annual fuel1,75 €/L | 15 000 km | 0,129 €/km | 1 935 € |
| Fuel | km/year | €/km | Annual cost |
|---|---|---|---|
| Annual fuel1,99 €/L | 15 000 km | 0,125 €/km | 1 875 € |
On a 100 km mixed trip, the BMW X5 M50d and Ford Puma ST 200 have a near-identical cost per km with default parameters. The gap becomes significant once you enter your actual energy prices.
The Ford Puma ST 200 is cheaper across all distances with default rates. If your energy prices differ significantly, simulate to see the real impact on your budget.