Mustang Mach-E RWD
Annual energy cost · 15 000 km
3,71 € / 100 km
Equivalent to 280 L of petrol 95 per year
- Weighted consumption
- 17,7 kWh/100km
- Energy rate
- 0,21 €/kWh · home
- Energy used
- 2652,0 kWh per year
Consumption comparison
Same car, two powertrains. The simulator below calculates the gap based on your mileage and charging type.
Annual mileage
15 000 km/an
Simulated driving mix
Drag anywhere on the bar to adjust
Charging type
Typical annual usage : Mix 30% city / 50% road / 20% motorway · charging home (0,21 €/kWh)
Annual energy cost · 15 000 km
3,71 € / 100 km
Equivalent to 280 L of petrol 95 per year
Annual energy cost · 15 000 km
3,63 € / 100 km
Equivalent to 273 L of petrol 95 per year
Renault Scenic E-Tech Electric 220 costs 13 €/an less in energy than Ford Mustang Mach-E RWD, over 15 000 kmwith home for this driving mix.
≈ 7 L of petrol 95 saved per year
Cumulative projection by annual mileage. The cheaper-to-run vehicle widens the gap year after year.
1 year
13 €
≈ 7 L petrol 95
3 years
39 €
≈ 20 L petrol 95
5 years
66 €
≈ 33 L petrol 95
10 years
131 €
≈ 66 L petrol 95
Cumulative savings for Renault Scenic E-Tech Electric 220 versus Ford Mustang Mach-E RWD. Excluding purchase, insurance, maintenance and depreciation.
Projection over 15 000 km/year, by proportion of each charging type.
| Charging mix | km/year | €/km | Annual cost |
|---|---|---|---|
| 100% Homeoff-peak rate · 0,21 €/kWh | 15 000 km2 550 kWh | 0,037 €/km | 557 € |
| 100% AC stationpublic AC rate · 0,30 €/kWh | 15 000 km2 550 kWh | 0,053 €/km | 796 € |
| 100% Fast DCDC motorway rate · 0,45 €/kWh | 15 000 km2 550 kWh | 0,080 €/km | 1 193 € |
| Typical mix80% home · 15% AC · 5% DC | 15 000 km2 550 kWh | 0,042 €/km | 625 € |
| Annual total (typical mix) | 625 € | ||
| Charging mix | km/year | €/km | Annual cost |
|---|---|---|---|
| 100% Homeoff-peak rate · 0,21 €/kWh | 15 000 km2 490 kWh | 0,036 €/km | 544 € |
| 100% AC stationpublic AC rate · 0,30 €/kWh | 15 000 km2 490 kWh | 0,052 €/km | 777 € |
| 100% Fast DCDC motorway rate · 0,45 €/kWh | 15 000 km2 490 kWh | 0,078 €/km | 1 165 € |
| Typical mix80% home · 15% AC · 5% DC | 15 000 km2 490 kWh | 0,041 €/km | 610 € |
| Annual total (typical mix) | 610 € | ||
Same scenarios: energy cost of a Equivalent petrol vehicle (~7,5 L/100km).
| Scenario | Mustang Mach-E RWD | Ref. Equivalent petrol vehicle | Scenic E-Tech Electric 220 | Ref. Equivalent petrol vehicle |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Daily100 km · home | 3,71 € | 14,93 € | 3,63 € | 14,93 € |
| Weekend200 km · home | 7,43 € | 29,85 € | 7,25 € | 29,85 € |
| Holiday500 km · fast DC | 39,78 € | 74,63 € | 38,84 € | 74,63 € |
| Annual20,000 km · typical mix | 832,73 € | 2985,00 € | 813,13 € | 2985,00 € |
Based on petrol 95 1,99 €/L · cons. Equivalent petrol vehicle 7,5 L/100km. Excluding purchase, maintenance and depreciation.
On a 100 km mixed trip, the Ford Mustang Mach-E RWD and Renault Scenic E-Tech Electric 220 have a near-identical cost per km with default parameters. The gap becomes significant once you enter your actual energy prices.
Renault Scenic E-Tech Electric 220 offers more range: 620 km vs 440 km for Ford Mustang Mach-E RWD (WLTP/EPA). In real motorway use, expect 10-20% less depending on temperature.
The Renault Scenic E-Tech Electric 220 is cheaper across all distances with default rates. If your energy prices differ significantly, simulate to see the real impact on your budget.