Puma EcoBoost 125
Annual energy cost · 15 000 km
8,86 € / 100 km
Equivalent to 668 L of petrol 95 per year
- Weighted consumption
- 4,5 L/100km
- Fuel price
- 1,99 €/L
- Fuel used
- 667,5 L per year
Consumption comparison
Same car, two powertrains. The simulator below calculates the gap based on your mileage and charging type.
Annual mileage
15 000 km/an
Simulated driving mix
Drag anywhere on the bar to adjust
Fuel price
Petrol 95 : 1,99 €/L·Diesel : 1,75 €/L
Typical annual usage : Mix 30% city / 50% road / 20% motorway
Annual energy cost · 15 000 km
8,86 € / 100 km
Equivalent to 668 L of petrol 95 per year
Annual energy cost · 15 000 km
8,58 € / 100 km
Equivalent to 647 L of petrol 95 per year
Honda HR-V costs 42 €/an less in energy than Ford Puma EcoBoost 125, over 15 000 km for this driving mix.
≈ 21 L of petrol 95 saved per year
Cumulative projection by annual mileage. The cheaper-to-run vehicle widens the gap year after year.
1 year
42 €
≈ 21 L petrol 95
3 years
125 €
≈ 63 L petrol 95
5 years
209 €
≈ 105 L petrol 95
10 years
418 €
≈ 210 L petrol 95
Cumulative savings for Honda HR-V versus Ford Puma EcoBoost 125. Excluding purchase, insurance, maintenance and depreciation.
Projection over 15 000 km/year.
| Fuel | km/year | €/km | Annual cost |
|---|---|---|---|
| Annual fuel1,99 €/L | 15 000 km | 0,089 €/km | 1 328 € |
| Fuel | km/year | €/km | Annual cost |
|---|---|---|---|
| Annual fuel1,99 €/L | 15 000 km | 0,086 €/km | 1 287 € |
On a 100 km mixed trip, the Ford Puma EcoBoost 125 and Honda HR-V have a near-identical cost per km with default parameters. The gap becomes significant once you enter your actual energy prices.
The Honda HR-V is cheaper across all distances with default rates. If your energy prices differ significantly, simulate to see the real impact on your budget.