Ford Puma EcoBoost 125

Petrolsmall SUVGENERATION II, 2020

125 hp, 9,9 s 0-100 : among the 12 B-SUV 2018–2022, the Puma EcoBoost 125 ranks 1st of 12 in Combined consumption, 1st of 10 in Tank range, 7th of 12 in 0–100 km/h. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.

Power
125 hp
190 Nm
0 → 100 km/h
9.9 s
VMax 188 km/h
Cons.
4.3 L
/100 km
Tank
42 L

Full specifications

Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.

Powertrain

Power
125 hp
Couple
190 Nm
Gearbox
Double embrayage 7 rapports Automatique

Consumption

Cons. WLTP
4.3 L/100 km
Tank
42 L

Performance

0 → 100 km/h
9,9 s
VMax
188 km/h

Dimensions and environment

Width
1,805 mm
Height
1,532 mm
Kerb weight
1,228 kg
Cd
0.32

Caralogy Methodology

Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.

See full methodology

Manufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance

Among the 12 B-SUV, the Puma EcoBoost 125 ranks (best in segment) in fuel consumption. Caralogy simulates its real-world cost: motorway simulation, consumption simulation and performance simulation.

Tailored to this vehicle?

Caralogy Verdict
Suitable for

Good compromise for regular use without available charging infrastructure. 1st of 12 in Combined consumption (4.3 L/100), 1st of 10 in Tank range (977 km).

Alternatives to consider

If the priority is 0–100 km/h, the Ford Puma ST 200 (1st with 6.7 s) takes the lead.

Fuel consumption: 4.3 L/100 L/100 (1st of 12 in Combined consumption)

The Puma EcoBoost 125 consumes 4.3 L/100 on the WLTP combined cycle. The segment reference is the Ford Puma EcoBoost 125 (4.3 L/100).

Tank range: 977 km (1st of 10 in Tank range)

On a full tank, the Puma EcoBoost 125 covers 977 km on the combined cycle. The segment reference reaches 977 km.

Where the Puma EcoBoost 125 stands against B-SUV

Comparison across 12 B-SUV marketed between 2018–2022.
Combined consumption1e / 12
4.3 L/100
Min 7.3 L/100 · Hyundai Kona 1.6 T-GDi 7DCT 198 chMax 4.3 L/100 · Ford Puma EcoBoost 125
Tank range1e / 10
977 km
Min 652 km · MG ZS 1.5 VTi FWDMax 977 km · Ford Puma EcoBoost 125
0–100 km/h7e / 12
9,9 s
Min 12,0 s · MG ZS 1.5 VTi FWDMax 6,7 s · Ford Puma ST 200

Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)

Cross-energy alternatives

Same needs, different powertrain.

Popular duels involving the Puma EcoBoost 125

Continue with the Ford Puma EcoBoost 125

The same car, from other angles.

Ford Puma EcoBoost 125: what you need to know

Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.

Where does the Puma EcoBoost 125 rank in its segment?

Among the 12 B-SUV 2018–2022, the Puma EcoBoost 125 ranks 1st of 12 in Combined consumption (4.3 L/100, behind the Ford Puma EcoBoost 125), 1st of 10 in Tank range (977 km, behind the Ford Puma EcoBoost 125), 7th of 12 in 0–100 km/h (9.9 s, behind the Ford Puma ST 200).

What is the range of the Puma EcoBoost 125?

977 km on a full tank (4.3 L/100 on the combined cycle) - 1st of 10 in Tank range.

How much does the Puma EcoBoost 125 cost to run?

Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.

How does Caralogy calculate its figures?

Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.