Skip to main content
CaralogyCaralogy
HomeBrandsRoad TripBudgetDuelGuides
Caralogy

The car comparison platform. Physics simulation, road trips, real costs.

Navigation
All brandsCar duelRunning costsMotorwayMethodology
Simulators
Motorway simulatorRunning costsPerformance duel
Brands
VolkswagenBMWMercedesToyotaTeslaAudi
FRENDEESIT
© 2026 Caralogy · All rights reserved
  1. Home
  2. /Consumption
  3. /SUV
PumavsCR-VPetrol
  • MotorwayMotorwayRange and charging
  • PerformancePerformance0-100, top speed
  • ConsumptionConsumptionYearly cost
  • SpecsPuma · CR-V

Ford Puma ST 200 vs Honda CR-V: which is cheaper to run?

What each kilometre costs, depending on your driving profile and how you charge. Annual projection and cumulative savings over 10 years.

small SUV · 2021 vs 2018 · 15,000 km/an · Mixed · Petrol 95 2.17 €/L · Methodology
Annual mileage
15,000 km
5,000 km50,000 km
Driving mix

30 % City · 50 % Road · 20 % Motorway

Fuel price
Petrol 95 2.17 €/L · Diesel 2.38 €/Lprix-carburants.gouv.fr — moyenne nationale du 05/10/2026 ; EDF Tarif Bleu Base au 01/08/2026 ; DC autoroute : moyenne des réseaux sans abonnement

Result · yearly energy cost

AFord Puma ST 200

2,044 €per year

6,3 L/100 km weighted · 13.63 € per 100 km · 942 L per year

Gap485 € per yearin favour of the Puma ST 200 (−19 %)≈ 223 L petrol 95
BHonda CR-V

2,529 €per year

7,8 L/100 km weighted · 16.86 € per 100 km · 1 166 L per year

The verdict changes with your usage
ProfileSplitAA · PumaBB · CR-VGap
City70 / 25 / 570 % city · 25 % road · 5 % motorway2,301 €2,809 €508 € · Puma
Mixed30 / 50 / 2030 % city · 50 % road · 20 % motorway2,044 €2,529 €485 € · Puma
Long-distance10 / 40 / 5010 % city · 40 % road · 50 % motorway1,842 €2,301 €459 € · Puma

Cumulative saving for the Puma ST 200

1 year
485 €
3 years
1,455 €
5 years
2,425 €
10 years
4,850 €

Energy only. Excludes purchase, insurance, servicing, depreciation.

What produces these figures

WLTP combined
6.0 L/100 km · 7.5 L/100 km
Powertrain
Combustion · Combustion
Power
200 ch · 193 ch
Kerb weight
1,297 kg · 1,645 kg

Other similar comparisons

AudiVSHonda

Q3 Sportback vs CR-V

gap 510 €/year
HondaVSBMW

CR-V vs X1 sDrive20i

gap 651 €/year
HondaVSBMW

CR-V vs X1 xDrive20i

gap 386 €/year
HondaVSBMW

CR-V vs X2 sDrive20i

gap 651 €/year

Frequently asked questions

On a 100 km mixed trip, the Ford Puma ST 200 is about 20% cheaper than the Honda CR-V with default parameters. This ratio shifts with your actual energy prices - simulate for your profile.

The Ford Puma ST 200 is cheaper across all distances with default rates. If your energy prices differ significantly, simulate to see the real impact on your budget.