CR-VPetrol

Honda CR-V

Petrolcompact SUVGENERATION Gen V, 2018

193 hp, 8,2 s 0-100 : among the 30 C-SUV 2016–2020, the CR-V ranks 27th of 30 in Combined consumption, 14th of 30 in 0–100 km/h. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.

Power: 193 hp; 240 Nm
0 → 100 km/h: 8.2 s; VMax 205 km/h
Cons.: 7.5 L; /100 km
Tank: -

Full specifications

Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.

Powertrain

Displacement: 1,498 cm³
Power: 193 hp
Couple: 240 Nm
Gearbox: CVT 7 rapports Automatique
Transmission: Integrale (AWD)

Consumption

Cons. WLTP: 7.5 L/100 km

Performance

0 → 100 km/h: 8,2 s
VMax: 205 km/h

Dimensions and environment

Width: 1,855 mm
Height: 1,679 mm
Kerb weight: 1,645 kg
Cd: 0.33

Caralogy Methodology

Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.

See full methodology

Manufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance

Among the 30 C-SUV, the CR-V ranks (in the bottom third) in fuel consumption. Caralogy simulates its real-world cost: motorway simulation, consumption simulation and performance simulation.

Tailored to this vehicle?

Fuel consumption: 7.5 L/100 L/100 (27th of 30 in Combined consumption)

The CR-V consumes 7.5 L/100 on the WLTP combined cycle. The segment reference is the BMW X1 xDrive18d (4.3 L/100).

Go beyond this analysis

Recalculate everything for your own profile with the three physics simulators that power this page.

Running cost for your profile

Adjust mileage, driving mix and charging type to estimate your annual energy budget.

Launch simulator

Long-distance trip

Simulate any motorway trip: time, charging stops, total cost.

Simulate a trip

Chronos & accélération

0-100, 0-200, courbe de vitesse, positionnement segment.

Voir la performance

Where the CR-V stands against C-SUV

Comparison across 30 C-SUV marketed between 2016–2020.

Combined consumption27^e / 30

7.5 L/100

Min 8.6 L/100 · Cupra Formentor VZMax 4.3 L/100 · BMW X1 xDrive18d

0–100 km/h14^e / 30

8,2 s

Min 11,8 s · Nissan Qashqai 1.2 DIG-T 115 XtronicMax 4,9 s · Cupra Formentor VZ

Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)

PetrolAudi Q3 Sportback193 hp · 7.5 s PetrolBMW X1 sDrive20i192 hp · 7.6 s PetrolBMW X1 xDrive20i192 hp · 7.9 s PetrolBMW X2 sDrive20i192 hp · 7.7 s

Cross-energy alternatives

Same needs, different powertrain.

HEVBMW X1 sDrive18i136 hp · 9.7 s PetrolBMW X1 sDrive20i192 hp · 7.6 s DieselBMW X1 xDrive18d150 hp · 9.3 s HEVBMW X1 xDrive20i178 hp · 7.3 s PHEVBMW X1 xDrive25e220 hp · 6.9 s PHEVBMW X1 xDrive25e220 hp · 6.9 s

Popular duels involving the CR-V

PetrolAudi Q3 Sportback vs CR-V193 hp · 6.8 L PetrolBMW X1 sDrive20i vs CR-V192 hp · 6.0 L PetrolBMW X1 xDrive20i vs CR-V192 hp · 6.7 L PetrolBMW X2 sDrive20i vs CR-V192 hp · 6.0 L

Continue with the Honda CR-V

The same car, from other angles.

Consumption
Consumption and annual running cost of the Honda CR-V
2,287 €/yr · 15,000 km/yr
Motorway
Simulated motorway trip of the Honda CR-V: stops and duration
Performance
Performance of the Honda CR-V: 0-100 and lap times
0-100 in 8.3 s · 193 hp

Honda CR-V: what you need to know

Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.

Where does the CR-V rank in its segment?

Among the 30 C-SUV 2016–2020, the CR-V ranks 27th of 30 in Combined consumption (7.5 L/100, behind the BMW X1 xDrive18d), 14th of 30 in 0–100 km/h (8.2 s, behind the Cupra Formentor VZ).

How much does the CR-V cost to run?

Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.

Why not a BMW X1 xDrive18d instead?

The BMW X1 xDrive18d leads in Combined consumption (4.3 L/100 vs 7.5 L/100). The choice depends on your priorities: check the CR-V vs BMW X1 xDrive18d duel for a detailed comparison.

How does Caralogy calculate its figures?

Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.