On a 100 km mixed trip, the Tesla Model 3 Long Range AWD is about 15% cheaper than the Mercedes EQS 450 with default parameters. This ratio shifts with your actual energy prices - simulate for your profile.
Consumption comparison
Same car, two powertrains. The simulator below calculates the gap based on your mileage and charging type.
497 €per year
16,6 kWh/100 km weighted · 3,32 € per 100 km · 2 486 kWh per year
Cheaper to runAnnual mileage
15 000 km/an
Simulated driving mix
Drag anywhere on the bar to adjust
Charging type
| Profile | Split | Model 3 | EQS | Gap | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| City | 70 % city · 25 % road · 5 % motorway | 489 € | 579 € | 90 € | Model 3 |
| Mixed | 30 % city · 50 % road · 20 % motorway | 497 € | 576 € | 79 € | Model 3 |
| Long-distance | 10 % city · 40 % road · 50 % motorway | 519 € | 593 € | 74 € | Model 3 |
On a 100 km mixed trip, the Tesla Model 3 Long Range AWD is about 15% cheaper than the Mercedes EQS 450 with default parameters. This ratio shifts with your actual energy prices - simulate for your profile.
Mercedes EQS 450 offers more range: 695 km vs 560 km for Tesla Model 3 Long Range AWD (WLTP/EPA). In real motorway use, expect 10-20% less depending on temperature.
The Tesla Model 3 Long Range AWD is cheaper across all distances with default rates. If your energy prices differ significantly, simulate to see the real impact on your budget.