Skip to main content
CaralogyCaralogy
HomeBrandsRoad TripBudgetDuelGuides
Caralogy

The car comparison platform. Physics simulation, road trips, real costs.

Navigation
All brandsCar duelRunning costsMotorwayMethodology
Simulators
Motorway simulatorRunning costsPerformance duel
Brands
VolkswagenBMWMercedesToyotaTeslaAudi
FRENDEESIT
© 2026 Caralogy · All rights reserved
  1. Home
  2. /Consumption
  3. /SUV
MacanvsPumaPetrol
  • MotorwayMotorwayRange and charging
  • PerformancePerformance0-100, top speed
  • ConsumptionConsumptionYearly cost
  • SpecsMacan · Puma

Porsche Macan S vs Ford Puma ST 200: which is cheaper to run?

What each kilometre costs, depending on your driving profile and how you charge. Annual projection and cumulative savings over 10 years.

family SUV · 2019 vs 2021 · 15,000 km/an · Mixed · Petrol 95 2.17 €/L · Methodology
Annual mileage
15,000 km
5,000 km50,000 km
Driving mix

30 % City · 50 % Road · 20 % Motorway

Fuel price
Petrol 95 2.17 €/L · Diesel 2.38 €/Lprix-carburants.gouv.fr — moyenne nationale du 05/10/2026 ; EDF Tarif Bleu Base au 01/08/2026 ; DC autoroute : moyenne des réseaux sans abonnement

Result · yearly energy cost

APorsche Macan S

3,674 €per year

11,3 L/100 km weighted · 24.49 € per 100 km · 1 693 L per year

Gap1,629 € per yearin favour of the Puma ST 200 (−44 %)≈ 751 L petrol 95
BFord Puma ST 200

2,044 €per year

6,3 L/100 km weighted · 13.63 € per 100 km · 942 L per year

The verdict changes with your usage
ProfileSplitAA · MacanBB · PumaGap
City70 / 25 / 570 % city · 25 % road · 5 % motorway4,104 €2,301 €1,803 € · Puma
Mixed30 / 50 / 2030 % city · 50 % road · 20 % motorway3,674 €2,044 €1,629 € · Puma
Long-distance10 / 40 / 5010 % city · 40 % road · 50 % motorway3,340 €1,842 €1,497 € · Puma

Cumulative saving for the Puma ST 200

1 year
1,629 €
3 years
4,888 €
5 years
8,147 €
10 years
16,295 €

Energy only. Excludes purchase, insurance, servicing, depreciation.

What produces these figures

WLTP combined
10.8 L/100 km · 6.0 L/100 km
Powertrain
Combustion · Combustion
Power
354 ch · 200 ch
Kerb weight
1,923 kg · 1,297 kg

Other similar comparisons

BMWVSPorsche

X3 M40i vs Macan S

gap 749 €/year
BMWVSPorsche

X4 M40i vs Macan S

gap 758 €/year
BMWVSPorsche

X3 M40i vs Macan S

gap 1 179 €/year
BMWVSPorsche

X3 M40i vs Macan S

gap 1 235 €/year

Frequently asked questions

On a 100 km mixed trip, the Ford Puma ST 200 is about 45% cheaper than the Porsche Macan S with default parameters. This ratio shifts with your actual energy prices - simulate for your profile.

The Ford Puma ST 200 is cheaper across all distances with default rates. If your energy prices differ significantly, simulate to see the real impact on your budget.