Skip to main content
CaralogyCaralogy
HomeBrandsRoad TripBudgetDuelGuides
Caralogy

The car comparison platform. Physics simulation, road trips, real costs.

Navigation
All brandsCar duelRunning costsMotorwayMethodology
Simulators
Motorway simulatorRunning costsPerformance duel
Brands
VolkswagenBMWMercedesToyotaTeslaAudi
FRENDEESIT
© 2026 Caralogy · All rights reserved
  1. Home
  2. /Consumption
  3. /SUV
ScenicBEVvsPumaPetrol
  • MotorwayMotorwayRange and charging
  • PerformancePerformance0-100, top speed
  • ConsumptionConsumptionYearly cost

Renault Scenic E-Tech Electric 220 vs Ford Puma ST 200: which is cheaper to run?

What each kilometre costs, depending on your driving profile and how you charge. Annual projection and cumulative savings over 10 years.

compact SUV · 2024 vs 2021 · 15,000 km/an · Mixed · Petrol 95 2.17 €/L · Home 0.20 €/kWh · Methodology
Annual mileage
15,000 km
5,000 km50,000 km
Driving mix

30 % City · 50 % Road · 20 % Motorway

Fuel price
Petrol 95 2.17 €/L · Diesel 2.38 €/Lprix-carburants.gouv.fr — moyenne nationale du 05/10/2026 ; EDF Tarif Bleu Base au 01/08/2026 ; DC autoroute : moyenne des réseaux sans abonnement
Charging type

Result · yearly energy cost

ARenault Scenic E-Tech Electric 220

518 €per year

17,3 kWh/100 km weighted · 3.45 € per 100 km · 2 590 kWh per year

Gap1,526 € per yearin favour of the Scenic E-Tech Electric 220 (−75 %)≈ 703 L petrol 95
BFord Puma ST 200

2,044 €per year

6,3 L/100 km weighted · 13.63 € per 100 km · 942 L per year

The verdict changes with your usage
ProfileSplitAA · ScenicBB · PumaGap
City70 / 25 / 570 % city · 25 % road · 5 % motorway441 €2,301 €1,860 € · Scenic
Mixed30 / 50 / 2030 % city · 50 % road · 20 % motorway518 €2,044 €1,526 € · Scenic
Long-distance10 / 40 / 5010 % city · 40 % road · 50 % motorway613 €1,842 €1,229 € · Scenic

Cumulative saving for the Scenic E-Tech Electric 220

1 year
1,526 €
3 years
4,578 €
5 years
7,630 €
10 years
15,260 €

Energy only. Excludes purchase, insurance, servicing, depreciation.

What produces these figures

WLTP combined
16.6 kWh/100 km · 6.0 L/100 km
Powertrain
Fully electric · Combustion
Power
218 ch · 200 ch
Kerb weight
1,989 kg · 1,297 kg

Other similar comparisons

RenaultVSBYD

Scenic E-Tech Electric 220 vs Atto 3 Extended Range

gap 75 €/year
RenaultVSAudi

Scenic E-Tech Electric 220 vs Q4 40 e-tron 150 kW

gap 158 €/year
RenaultVSAudi

Scenic E-Tech Electric 220 vs Q4 Sportback 40 e-tron 150 kW

AudiVSRenault

Q4 45 e-tron 210 kW vs Scenic E-Tech Electric 220

gap 104 €/year

Frequently asked questions

On a 100 km mixed trip, the Renault Scenic E-Tech Electric 220 is about 75% cheaper than the Ford Puma ST 200 with default parameters. This ratio shifts with your actual energy prices - simulate for your profile.

The declared range of the Renault Scenic E-Tech Electric 220 is 620 km (WLTP/EPA). In real-world conditions, expect 10-20% less.

The Renault Scenic E-Tech Electric 220 is cheaper across all distances with default rates. If your energy prices differ significantly, simulate to see the real impact on your budget.

  • SpecsScenic · Puma