Skip to main content
CaralogyCaralogy
HomeBrandsRoad TripBudgetDuelGuides
Caralogy

The car comparison platform. Physics simulation, road trips, real costs.

Navigation
All brandsCar duelRunning costsMotorwayMethodology
Simulators
Motorway simulatorRunning costsPerformance duel
Brands
VolkswagenBMWMercedesToyotaTeslaAudi
FRENDEESIT
© 2026 Caralogy · All rights reserved
  1. Home
  2. /Consumption
  3. /SUV
EX40vsI-PACEBEV
  • MotorwayMotorwayRange and charging
  • PerformancePerformance0-100, top speed
  • ConsumptionConsumptionYearly cost
  • Specs

Volvo EX40 Twin Motor AWD vs Jaguar I-PACE EV400: which is cheaper to run?

What each kilometre costs, depending on your driving profile and how you charge. Annual projection and cumulative savings over 10 years.

compact SUV · 2024 vs 2019 · 15,000 km/an · Mixed · Home 0.20 €/kWh · Methodology
Annual mileage
15,000 km
5,000 km50,000 km
Driving mix

30 % City · 50 % Road · 20 % Motorway

Charging type

Result · yearly energy cost

AVolvo EX40 Twin Motor AWD

634 €per year

21,1 kWh/100 km weighted · 4.23 € per 100 km · 3 170 kWh per year

Gap72 € per yearin favour of the I-PACE EV400 (−11 %)≈ 33 L petrol 95
BJaguar I-PACE EV400

562 €per year

18,7 kWh/100 km weighted · 3.75 € per 100 km · 2 808 kWh per year

The verdict changes with your usage
ProfileSplitAA · EX40BB · I-PACEGap
City70 / 25 / 570 % city · 25 % road · 5 % motorway606 €478 €128 € · I-PACE
Mixed30 / 50 / 2030 % city · 50 % road · 20 % motorway634 €562 €72 € · I-PACE
Long-distance10 / 40 / 5010 % city · 40 % road · 50 % motorway660 €665 €Nearly level

Cumulative saving for the I-PACE EV400

1 year
72 €
3 years
217 €
5 years
362 €
10 years
723 €

Energy only. Excludes purchase, insurance, servicing, depreciation.

What produces these figures

WLTP combined
21.3 kWh/100 km · 18.0 kWh/100 km
Powertrain
Fully electric · Fully electric
Power
408 ch · 400 ch
Kerb weight
2,110 kg · 2,208 kg

Other similar comparisons

VolvoVSAudi

EX40 Twin Motor AWD vs Q4 Sportback 55 e-tron quattro 250 kW

gap 5 897 €/year
JaguarVSTesla

I-PACE EV400 vs Model Y Long Range AWD

gap 67 €/year
VolvoVSAudi

EX40 Twin Motor AWD vs Q4 45 e-tron 210 kW

gap 259 €/year
JaguarVSTesla

I-PACE EV400 vs Model Y Long Range AWD

gap 70 €/year

Frequently asked questions

On a 100 km mixed trip, the Jaguar I-PACE EV400 is about 10% cheaper than the Volvo EX40 Twin Motor AWD with default parameters. This ratio shifts with your actual energy prices - simulate for your profile.

Jaguar I-PACE EV400 offers more range: 470 km vs 340 km for Volvo EX40 Twin Motor AWD (WLTP/EPA). In real motorway use, expect 10-20% less depending on temperature.

The Jaguar I-PACE EV400 is cheaper across all distances with default rates. If your energy prices differ significantly, simulate to see the real impact on your budget.

EX40
· I-PACE