Over 0–100 km/h, Giulia Veloce wins (5,25 s vs 11,24 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| Giulia Veloce | 216d Active Tourer F44 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 5,25 s−5,99 s | 11,24 s |
| 400 m standing start | 13,56 s−4,63 s | 18,19 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 24,89 s−7,82 s | 32,71 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 240 km/h+45 km/h | 195 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 5,68 kg/hpbetter ratio | 12,24 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | Giulia Veloce | 216d Active Tourer F44 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,41 s | 2,74 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,11 s | 4,51 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 3,73 s | 8,00 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 5,25 s | 11,24 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 7,04 s | 15,62 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 12,32 s | 30,48 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 21,59 s | - |
| 400 m standing start | 13,56 s | 18,19 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 24,89 s | 32,71 s |
| Top speed | 240 km/h | 195 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 280 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 400 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 590 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | - | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed automatic |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 116 hp | 3 cyl |
| Torque | 270 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 420 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | - | |
| Gearbox | 6-speed manual (7-speed Steptronic with double clutch) |
Off the line, the Giulia Veloce hits 100 km/h in 5.26 s versus 11.24 s for the Bmw 216d Active Tourer. At this point, the Giulia Veloce leads by 5.99 s and sits roughly 39 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Giulia Veloce is doing 135 km/h against 104 km/h for the Bmw 216d Active Tourer. The gap is 3.23 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the Giulia Veloce crosses the line in 13.56 s versus 18.18 s. The 4.62 s gap represents roughly 155 m of track - a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the Giulia Veloce continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 186 km/h versus 145 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Giulia Veloce finishes in 24.89 s versus 32.71 s, with a 7.82 s lead.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the Giulia Veloce is capped at 240 km/h, the Bmw 216d Active Tourer at 195 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (5.68 kg/hp vs 12.24 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 18.36 seconds. The 5.99 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Over 0–100 km/h, Giulia Veloce wins (5,25 s vs 11,24 s).
Giulia Veloce goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 5,25 seconds (calibrated simulation).
Giulia Veloce: 280 hp, ratio 5,68 kg/hp. 216d Active Tourer F44: 116 hp, ratio 12,24 kg/hp.
Giulia Veloce: 240 km/h. 216d Active Tourer F44: 195 km/h.