Sur 0–100 km/h, Stelvio Quadrifoglio gagne (3,83 s vs 5,63 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| Stelvio Quadrifoglio | Cayenne E3.1 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 3,83 s−1,80 s | 5,63 s |
| 400 m standing start | 11,86 s−2,01 s | 13,87 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 21,59 s−3,77 s | 25,36 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 283 km/h+38 km/h | 245 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 3,59 kg/hpbetter ratio | 5,84 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | Stelvio Quadrifoglio | Cayenne E3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,03 s | 1,33 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 1,72 s | 2,24 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 2,92 s | 4,02 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 3,83 s | 5,63 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 5,03 s | 7,59 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 8,13 s | 13,19 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 12,83 s | 23,12 s |
| 400 m standing start | 11,86 s | 13,87 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 21,59 s | 25,36 s |
| Top speed | 283 km/h | 245 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 510 hp | |
| Torque | 600 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 830 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | — | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed automatic |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 340 hp | V6 |
| Torque | 450 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 985 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | TORQUE_CONVERTER |
Off the line, the Stelvio Quadrifoglio hits 100 km/h in 3.83 s versus 5.63 s for the Cayenne. At this point, the Stelvio Quadrifoglio leads by 1.80 s and sits roughly 13 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Stelvio Quadrifoglio is doing 156 km/h against 133 km/h for the Cayenne. The gap is 1.26 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the Stelvio Quadrifoglio crosses the line in 11.86 s versus 13.87 s. The 2.01 s gap represents roughly 88 m of track — a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the Stelvio Quadrifoglio continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 216 km/h versus 184 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Stelvio Quadrifoglio finishes in 21.59 s versus 25.36 s, with a 3.77 s lead.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the Stelvio Quadrifoglio is capped at 283 km/h, the Cayenne at 245 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit — it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (3.59 kg/hp vs 5.84 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs auto).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 8.70 seconds. The 1.80 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, Stelvio Quadrifoglio gagne (3,83 s vs 5,63 s).
Stelvio Quadrifoglio passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 3,83 secondes (simulation calibrée).
Stelvio Quadrifoglio : 510 hp, ratio 3,59 kg/hp. Cayenne E3.1 : 340 hp, ratio 5,84 kg/hp.
Stelvio Quadrifoglio : 283 km/h. Cayenne E3.1 : 245 km/h.