Sur 0–100 km/h, Model Y Performance gagne (3,76 s vs 3,83 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| Stelvio Quadrifoglio | Model Y Performance | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 3,83 s | 3,76 s+0,07 s |
| 400 m standing start | 11,86 s−0,16 s | 12,02 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 21,59 s−0,48 s | 22,07 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 283 km/h+33 km/h | 250 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 3,59 kg/hpbetter ratio | 4,39 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | Stelvio Quadrifoglio | Model Y Performance |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,03 s | 1,03 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 1,72 s | 1,72 stight gap |
| 0–80 km/h | 2,92 s | 2,80 stight gap |
| 0–100 km/h | 3,83 s | 3,76 stight gap |
| 0–120 km/h | 5,03 s | 4,98 stight gap |
| 0–160 km/h | 8,13 s | 8,65 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 12,83 s | 14,13 s |
| 400 m standing start | 11,86 s | 12,02 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 21,59 s | 22,07 s |
| Top speed limited | 283 km/h | 250 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 510 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 600 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 830 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | — | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed automatic |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 456 hp | Dual Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor |
| Torque | 670 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 003 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | Single-speed fixed gear |
Off the line, the Model Y Performance hits 100 km/h in 3.76 s versus 3.83 s for the Stelvio Quadrifoglio. The instant torque of 670 Nm from the electric motor makes the difference. The 0.07 s gap is negligible: both vehicles are neck and neck.
At 200 metres, the Stelvio Quadrifoglio is doing 156 km/h against 152 km/h for the Model Y Performance. The gap is 0.00 s. The gap remains stable from the start.
At 400 metres standing start, the Stelvio Quadrifoglio crosses the line in 11.86 s versus 12.01 s. The 0.15 s gap represents roughly 8 m of track — barely a car length.
Past 400 metres, the Stelvio Quadrifoglio continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 216 km/h versus 209 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Stelvio Quadrifoglio finishes in 21.59 s versus 22.06 s, with a 0.47 s lead.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the Stelvio Quadrifoglio is capped at 283 km/h, the Model Y Performance at 249 (i.e. 155 mph — industry threshold) km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit — it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
Instant electric torque gives an advantage off the line. The higher top speed of the combustion engine gives an advantage over longer distances. The distance at which one catches the other depends on the top speed differential.
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 5.73 seconds. The 0.07 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, Model Y Performance gagne (3,76 s vs 3,83 s).
Stelvio Quadrifoglio passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 3,83 secondes (simulation calibrée).
Stelvio Quadrifoglio : 510 hp, ratio 3,59 kg/hp. Model Y Performance : 456 hp, ratio 4,39 kg/hp.
Stelvio Quadrifoglio : 283 km/h. Model Y Performance : 250 km/h.