Over 0–100 km/h, Stelvio Veloce wins (5,76 s vs 7,46 s).
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| Stelvio Veloce | 320e G20 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 5,76 s−1,70 s | 7,46 s |
| 400 m standing start | 14,12 s−1,32 s | 15,44 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 26,01 s−2,76 s | 28,77 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 230 km/h+15 km/h | 215 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 6,59 kg/hpbetter ratio | 8,65 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | Stelvio Veloce | 320e G20 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,32 s | 1,31 stight gap |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,24 s | 2,37 stight gap |
| 0–80 km/h | 4,12 s | 4,96 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 5,76 s | 7,46 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 7,99 s | 10,74 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 14,32 s | 20,97 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 26,33 s | 46,63 s |
| 400 m standing start | 14,12 s | 15,44 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 26,01 s | 28,77 s |
| Top speed | 230 km/h | 215 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 280 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 400 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 845 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | - | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed automatic |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 204 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 350 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 765 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | - | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed Steptronic |
Off the line, the Stelvio Veloce hits 100 km/h in 5.76 s versus 7.46 s for the 320e. Despite lacking instant torque, 280 hp of power compensates. At this point, the Stelvio Veloce leads by 1.70 s and sits roughly 8 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Stelvio Veloce is doing 129 km/h against 115 km/h for the 320e. The gap is 0.71 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the Stelvio Veloce crosses the line in 14.12 s versus 15.43 s. The 1.32 s gap represents roughly 51 m of track - a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the Stelvio Veloce continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 177 km/h versus 158 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Stelvio Veloce finishes in 26.01 s versus 28.77 s, with a 2.76 s lead.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the Stelvio Veloce is capped at 230 km/h, the 320e at 220 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
Instant electric torque gives an advantage off the line. The higher top speed of the combustion engine gives an advantage over longer distances. The distance at which one catches the other depends on the top speed differential.
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 12.74 seconds. The 1.70 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Over 0–100 km/h, Stelvio Veloce wins (5,76 s vs 7,46 s).
Stelvio Veloce goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 5,76 seconds (calibrated simulation).
Stelvio Veloce: 280 hp, ratio 6,59 kg/hp. 320e G20: 204 hp, ratio 8,65 kg/hp.
Stelvio Veloce: 230 km/h. 320e G20: 215 km/h.