Over 0–100 km/h, A110 S 292 wins (3,93 s vs 7,92 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| A110 S 292 | X3 xDrive20d G01 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 3,93 s−3,99 s | 7,92 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12,09 s−3,68 s | 15,77 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 22,16 s−7,07 s | 29,23 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 264 km/h+51 km/h | 213 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 3,76 kg/hpbetter ratio | 9,66 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | A110 S 292 | X3 xDrive20d G01 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,09 s | 1,40 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 1,83 s | 2,59 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 3,02 s | 5,31 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 3,93 s | 7,92 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 5,26 s | 11,33 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 8,57 s | 21,92 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 13,51 s | 50,34 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12,09 s | 15,77 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 22,16 s | 29,23 s |
| Top speed | 264 km/h | 213 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 296 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 320 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 114 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | - | |
| Gearbox | 7-speed dual-clutch |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp | 4 cyl |
| Torque | 400 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 835 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed Steptronic |
Off the line, the A110 S 292 hits 100 km/h in 3.93 s versus 7.92 s for the Bmw X3 xDrive20d. At this point, the A110 S 292 leads by 3.99 s and sits roughly 16 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the A110 S 292 is doing 154 km/h against 114 km/h for the Bmw X3 xDrive20d. The gap is 2.20 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the A110 S 292 crosses the line in 12.08 s versus 15.76 s. The 3.68 s gap represents roughly 135 m of track - a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the A110 S 292 continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 210 km/h versus 156 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the A110 S 292 finishes in 22.15 s versus 29.22 s, with a 7.07 s lead.
Electronically capped at 213 km/h, the Bmw X3 xDrive20d never reaches its natural aerodynamic ceiling in this duel. That’s not a physical limit of the motor - it’s a deliberate manufacturer decision, typically tied to standard-fit tyre ratings or model-range positioning.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (3.76 kg/hp vs 9.66 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 13.46 seconds. The 3.99 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Over 0–100 km/h, A110 S 292 wins (3,93 s vs 7,92 s).
A110 S 292 goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 3,93 seconds (calibrated simulation).
A110 S 292: 296 hp, ratio 3,76 kg/hp. X3 xDrive20d G01: 190 hp, ratio 9,66 kg/hp.
A110 S 292: 264 km/h. X3 xDrive20d G01: 213 km/h.