Over 0–100 km/h, M4 F82 wins (4,24 s vs 7,00 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| M4 F82 | A6 Avant | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 4,24 s−2,76 s | 7,00 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12,38 s−2,64 s | 15,02 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 22,29 s−5,69 s | 27,98 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 250 km/h+12 km/h | 238 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 3,54 kg/hpbetter ratio | 9,80 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | M4 F82 | A6 Avant |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,14 s | 1,08 stight gap |
| 0–50 km/h | 1,90 s | 2,10 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 3,25 s | 4,60 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 4,24 s | 7,00 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 5,70 s | 10,04 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 9,14 s | 19,37 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 14,04 s | 34,70 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12,38 s | 15,02 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 22,29 s | 27,98 s |
| Top speed limited | 250 km/h | 238 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 480 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 550 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 700 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | - | |
| Gearbox | Six-speed manual |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 204 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 400 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 000 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | 7-speed S tronic |
Off the line, the Bmw M4 hits 100 km/h in 4.24 s versus 7.00 s for the A6 Avant. At this point, the Bmw M4 leads by 2.76 s and sits roughly 8 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Bmw M4 is doing 151 km/h against 117 km/h for the A6 Avant. The gap is 1.42 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the Bmw M4 crosses the line in 12.38 s versus 15.02 s. The 2.64 s gap represents roughly 102 m of track - a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the Bmw M4 continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 212 km/h versus 161 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Bmw M4 finishes in 22.29 s versus 27.98 s, with a 5.69 s lead. Both vehicles have similar top speeds (250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) vs 238 km/h), preventing any comeback.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the Bmw M4 is capped at 250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) km/h, the A6 Avant at 238 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (3.54 kg/hp vs 9.80 kg/hp) and transmission (Manual vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 11.76 seconds. The 2.76 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Over 0–100 km/h, M4 F82 wins (4,24 s vs 7,00 s).
M4 F82 goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 4,24 seconds (calibrated simulation).
M4 F82: 480 hp, ratio 3,54 kg/hp. A6 Avant: 204 hp, ratio 9,80 kg/hp.
M4 F82: 250 km/h. A6 Avant: 238 km/h.