F82 · GENERATION 2020 · SALOON
BMWICE

M4

480 hp, 4,2 s 0-100 : among the 27 saloons 2018–2022, the M4 ranks 6th of 27 in 0–100 km/h, 15th of 27 in Top speed, 7th of 27 in Power-to-weight. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.

Energy cost · estimate3,27215,000 km · UK mix · home 0,21 £/kWhConsumption →

Power

480hp

550 Nm

0 → 100 km/h

4.2s

VMax 250 km/h

Cons.

10.8L

/100 km

Tank

59L

Technical identity card

Full specifications BMW M4

Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.

Powertrain

Displacement2,993 cm³
Power480 hp
Couple550 Nm
GearboxManuelle 6 rapports Manuelle

Consumption

Cons. WLTP10.8 L/100km
Tank59 L

Performance

0 → 100 km/h4,2 s
VMax250 km/h

Dimensions and environment

Length4,794 mm
Wheelbase2,857 mm
Width1,887 mm
Height1,393 mm
Boot440 L
Kerb weight1,700 kg
Cd0.34
CO₂ WLTP248 g/km

Caralogy Methodology

Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.

See full methodology →

Manufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance

Among the 27 saloons, the M4 ranks (top 6 in segment) in acceleration. Caralogy simulates its real-world performance: motorway simulation, performance simulation and consumption simulation.

Caralogy Analysis

Tailored to this vehicle?

Caralogy Verdict
Suitable for

Demanding drivers: 6th of 27 in 0–100 km/h (4.2 s), 7th of 27 in Power-to-weight (282 hp/t). 6th of 27 in 0–100 km/h (4.2 s), 7th of 27 in Power-to-weight (282 hp/t).

Less suitable for

Frequent urban trips with stop-and-go. At 10,8 L/100 km on the combined cycle, consumption rises in the city without electric assistance. An HEV or PHEV would be more economical for this use profile.

Alternatives to consider

If the priority is 0–100 km/h, the BMW M3 Competition xDrive (1st with 3.5 s) takes the lead. If the priority is Top speed, the Kia Stinger GT 3.3T AWD (1st with 270 km/h) takes the lead.

Acceleration: 4.2 s 0-100 (6th of 27 in 0–100 km/h)

In pure acceleration, the M4 ranks 6th of 27 in 0–100 km/h, 0.7 s off the reference BMW M3 Competition xDrive (3.5 s).

Top speed: 250 km/h (15th of 27 in Top speed)

Top speed of 250 km/h. The segment reference reaches 270 km/h.

Segment positioning

Where the M4 stands against saloons

Comparison across 27 saloons marketed between 2018–2022.

0–100 km/h6e / 27
4,2 s
Min 6,0 s · Lexus IS 350 F Sport RWDMax 3,5 s · BMW M3 Competition xDrive
Top speed15e / 27
250 km/h
Min 240 km/h · Lexus IS 350 F Sport RWDMax 270 km/h · Kia Stinger GT 3.3T AWD
Power-to-weight7e / 27
282 hp/t
Min 169 hp/t · Kia Stinger 2.5T RWDMax 296 hp/t · Bmw M4 Competition

Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)

Cross-energy alternatives

Same needs, different powertrain.

Model family

The full BMW M4 F82 range

Generation F82 launched in 2014. Available versions sorted by energy.

Other versions of the F82

Compare

Popular duels involving the M4

Frequently asked questions

BMW M4: what you need to know

Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.

Among the 27 saloons 2018–2022, the M4 ranks 6th of 27 in 0–100 km/h (4.2 s, behind the BMW M3 Competition xDrive), 15th of 27 in Top speed (250 km/h, behind the Kia Stinger GT 3.3T AWD), 7th of 27 in Power-to-weight (282 hp/t, behind the Bmw M4 Competition).

Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.

The BMW M3 Competition xDrive leads in 0–100 km/h (3.5 s vs 4.2 s). The choice depends on your priorities: check the M4 vs BMW M3 Competition xDrive duel for a detailed comparison.

Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.