Over 0–100 km/h, Han EV AWD 380kW wins (3,86 s vs 4,14 s).
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
| Measure | e-tron GT quattro | Han EV AWD 380kW | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 4.14 s | 3.86 s | 0.28 s · Han EV AWD 380kW |
| 400 m standing start | 12.36 s | 12.05 s | 0.31 s · Han EV AWD 380kW |
| 1,000 m standing start | 22.46 s | 24.05 s | 1.59 s · e-tron GT quattro |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 245 km/h | 180 km/h | 65 km/h · e-tron GT quattro |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 3.95 kg/hp | 4.22 kg/hp | better ratio · e-tron GT quattro |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
| Stage | e-tron GT quattro | Han EV AWD 380kW |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1.13 s | 1.10 s · tight gap |
| 0–50 km/h | 1.88 s | 1.83 s · tight gap |
| 0–80 km/h | 3.08 s | 2.94 s · tight gap |
| 0–100 km/h | 4.14 s | 3.86 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 5.47 s | 5.02 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 9.25 s | 8.48 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 14.74 s | - |
| 400 m standing start | 12.36 s | 12.05 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 22.46 s | 24.05 s |
| Top speed | 245 km/h | 180 km/h |
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 577 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 830 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 280 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | Unknown |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 517 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 680 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 180 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | single-speed reduction AWD |
Off the line, the Han EV AWD 380kW hits 100 km/h in 3.86 s versus 4.14 s for the e-tron GT quattro. At this point, the Han EV AWD 380kW leads by 0.28 s and sits roughly 2 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Han EV AWD 380kW is doing 154 km/h against 149 km/h for the e-tron GT quattro. The gap is 0.22 s. The gap remains stable from the start.
At 400 metres standing start, the Han EV AWD 380kW crosses the line in 12.05 s versus 12.36 s. The 0.31 s gap represents roughly 16 m of track - two to three car lengths.
Past 400 metres, the situation changes. The Han EV AWD 380kW maxes out at 180 km/h while the e-tron GT quattro keeps accelerating towards 245 km/h. At 600 metres, the gap has dropped to 0.02 s.
Around 592 metres, both vehicles are level. This is the inversion point: the e-tron GT quattro overcomes its launch deficit thanks to a 65 km/h higher top speed.
At 1,000 metres, the e-tron GT quattro finishes in 22.46 s versus 24.04 s. The 1.59 s delta in favour of the e-tron GT quattro shows that top speed makes a clear difference.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the e-tron GT quattro is capped at 245 km/h, the Han EV AWD 380kW at 180 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
With two electric powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (3.95 kg/hp vs 4.22 kg/hp) and transmission (Unknown vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 6.28 seconds. The 0.28 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Over 0–100 km/h, Han EV AWD 380kW wins (3,86 s vs 4,14 s).
e-tron GT quattro goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 4,14 seconds (calibrated simulation).
e-tron GT quattro: 577 hp, ratio 3,95 kg/hp. Han EV AWD 380kW: 517 hp, ratio 4,22 kg/hp.
e-tron GT quattro: 245 km/h. Han EV AWD 380kW: 180 km/h.