Skip to main content
CaralogyCaralogy
HomeBrandsRoad TripBudgetDuelGuides
Caralogy

The car comparison platform. Physics simulation, road trips, real costs.

Navigation
All brandsCar duelRunning costsMotorwayMethodology
Simulators
Motorway simulatorRunning costsPerformance duel
Brands
VolkswagenBMWMercedesToyotaTeslaAudi
FRENDEESIT
© 2026 Caralogy · All rights reserved
  1. Home
  2. /Duel
  3. /SUV
AQ3vsBFormentorPetrol
  • MotorwayMotorwayRange and charging
  • PerformancePerformance0-100, top speed
  • ConsumptionConsumptionYearly cost
  • SpecsQ3 · Formentor

Audi Q3 Sportback vs Cupra Formentor: which is truly faster?

Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.

compact SUV · 2026 vs 2020 · Methodology
AudiPetrolFaster

Q3 Sportback

193 hp · 400 Nm · 1,705 kg · 2026

VS
CupraPetrol

Formentor

150 hp · 250 Nm · 1,460 kg · 2020

Result · 0–100 km/h

AAudi Q3 Sportback

7.51 s

Gap1.43 sin favour of Q3 Sportback
BCupra Formentor

8.94 s

Summary · Caralogy simulation
MeasureQ3 SportbackFormentorGap
0–100 km/h7.51 s8.94 s1.43 s · Q3 Sportback
400 m standing start15.30 s16.67 s1.37 s · Q3 Sportback
1,000 m standing start28.28 s30.05 s1.77 s · Q3 Sportback
Top speed (electronically limited)221 km/h215 km/h6 km/h · Q3 Sportback
Power-to-weight ratio8.83 kg/hp9.73 kg/hpbetter ratio · Q3 Sportback

Watch the race

Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.

AudiPetrolQ3 Sportback
Speed
0km/h
Timer
0,00s
Distance
0m
CupraPetrolFormentor
Speed
0km/h
Timer
0,00s
Distance
0m
100 m
200 m
300 m
400 m
500 m
600 m
700 m
800 m
900 m
1000 m
0m → 1000m
Gap0m

Stage-by-stage comparison

Simulated performance at each stage. Best value in bold.
StageQ3 SportbackFormentor
0–30 km/h1.22 s2.27 s
0–50 km/h2.25 s3.67 s
0–80 km/h5.03 s6.42 s
0–100 km/h7.51 s8.94 s
0–120 km/h10.43 s12.33 s
0–160 km/h19.35 s22.37 s
0–200 km/h38.40 s45.57 s
400 m standing start15.30 s16.67 s
1,000 m standing start28.28 s30.05 s
Top speed221 km/h215 km/h

Parameters and assumptions

Simulation

Start
Standing, straight line
Surface
Dry asphalt, 23°C
Wind
None
Driver
1 person, 75 kg

Calibration

Splits
0–100, 0–200 manufacturer
Power curve
Real measurement (Caralogy)
VMax
Manufacturer limited
Transmission
Losses integrated in model

Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.

Under the bonnet

Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.

Audi

Q3 Sportback

8,83kg/hpratio better by 0,90 kg/hp
CharacteristicValueDetail
Power193 hpPending
Torque400 Nm
Weight1 705 kgmanufacturer kerb weight
DrivetrainIntegrale (AWD)
Gearbox7-speed S tronic
Cupra

Formentor

9,73kg/hpcompensated by −245 kg
CharacteristicValueDetail
Power150 hpPending
Torque250 Nm
Weight1 460 kgmanufacturer kerb weight
DrivetrainTraction
Gearbox7-speed DSG

The start: 0 to 100 km/h

Off the line, the Q3 Sportback hits 100 km/h in 7.51 s versus 8.94 s for the Formentor. At this point, the Q3 Sportback leads by 1.43 s and sits roughly 30 m ahead.

From 100 km/h to 400 metres

At 200 metres, the Q3 Sportback is doing 116 km/h against 113 km/h for the Formentor. The gap is 1.20 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.

At 400 metres standing start, the Q3 Sportback crosses the line in 15.30 s versus 16.67 s. The 1.37 s gap represents roughly 52 m of track - a gap visible to the naked eye.

Beyond 400 metres: top speed comes into play

Past 400 metres, the Q3 Sportback continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 162 km/h versus 157 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Q3 Sportback finishes in 28.27 s versus 30.04 s, with a 1.77 s lead. Both vehicles have similar top speeds (221 vs 215 km/h), preventing any comeback.

What the numbers don’t tell you

The Q3 Sportback features all-wheel drive (AWD) against the Formentor’s FWD. At low speeds (0-30, 0-50, 0-80 km/h), AWD doubles the driven contact area: all four wheels transmit torque to the road, virtually eliminating wheelspin at launch. This traction advantage is decisive in the range where the motor delivers peak torque, before power and aerodynamics take over.

Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the Q3 Sportback is capped at 221 km/h, the Formentor at 215 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.

With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (8.83 kg/hp vs 9.73 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).

In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 14.31 seconds. The 1.43 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.

Compare with other alternatives

Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.

Instead of Formentor
BMW X1 sDrive20iBMW X2 sDrive20iBMW X1 xDrive20i

Other duels you might be interested in

AudiVSBMW

Q3 Sportback vs X1 sDrive20i

AudiVSBMW

Q3 Sportback vs X1 xDrive20i

AudiVSBMW

Q3 Sportback vs X2 sDrive20i

AudiVSBMW

Q3 Sportback vs X2 xDrive20i

Frequently asked questions

Over 0–100 km/h, Q3 Sportback wins (7,51 s vs 8,94 s).

Q3 Sportback goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 7,51 seconds (calibrated simulation).

Q3 Sportback: 193 hp, ratio 8,83 kg/hp. Formentor: 150 hp, ratio 9,73 kg/hp.

Q3 Sportback: 221 km/h. Formentor: 215 km/h.