F3 · GENERATION 2026 · COMPACT SUV
AudiICE

Q3 Sportback

193 hp, 7,5 s 0-100 : among the 11 C-SUV 2024–2028, the Q3 Sportback ranks 6th of 11 in Combined consumption, 4th of 11 in Tank range, 5th of 11 in 0–100 km/h. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.

Energy cost · estimate1,75415,000 km · UK mix · home UK £/kWhCustomise →

Power

193hp

400 Nm

0 → 100 km/h

7.5s

VMax 221 km/h

Cons.

6.8L

/100 km

Tank

58L

Sur cette page

Technical identity card

Full specifications Audi Q3 Sportback

Manufacturer data and values calibrated by the Caralogy simulation engine.

Powertrain

ArchitectureUnknown
Displacement1,968 cm\u00b3
Power193 hp
Couple400 Nm
GearboxTORQUE_CONVERTER 7 rapports Automatic
TransmissionAWD

Consumption

Cons. WLTP6,8 L/100km
Tank58 L

Performance

0 → 100 km/h7,5 s
VMax221 km/h

Dimensions and environment

Length4,531 mm
Wheelbase2,678 mm
Width1,859 mm
Height1,546 mm
Boot488 L
Kerb weight1,705 kg
Cd0.32
CO₂ WLTP178 g/km

Caralogy Methodology

Motorway and performance values calibrated by the Caralogy physics simulation engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves).

See full methodology →

Manufacturer data · motorway values calibrated by the Caralogy engine

Among the 11 C-SUV, the Q3 Sportback ranks (mid-table) in fuel consumption. Caralogy simulates its real-world cost: motorway simulation, consumption simulation and performance simulation.

Caralogy Analysis · tailored to this vehicle

Caralogy Verdict

Suitable for

C-SUV among the best in segment: 4th of 11 in Tank range (853 km).

Alternatives to consider

If the priority is Combined consumption, the Bmw X1 sDrive20d (1st with 5.1 L/100) takes the lead. If the priority is Tank range, the Audi Q3 Sportback (1st with 948 km) takes the lead.

Fuel consumption: 6.8 L/100 L/100 (6th of 11 in Combined consumption)

The Q3 Sportback consumes 6.8 L/100 on the WLTP combined cycle. The segment reference is the Bmw X1 sDrive20d (5.1 L/100).

Tank range: 853 km (4th of 11 in Tank range)

On a full tank, the Q3 Sportback covers 853 km on the combined cycle. The segment reference reaches 948 km.

Segment positioning

Where the Q3 Sportback stands against C-SUV

Comparison across 11 C-SUV marketed between 2024–2028.

Combined consumption

6eout of 11

6.8 L/100
Min9 L/100 · Audi Q3 SUV
Max5.1 L/100 · Bmw X1 sDrive20d

Tank range

4eout of 11

853 km
Min667 km · Audi Q3 SUV
Max948 km · Audi Q3 Sportback

0–100 km/h

5eout of 11

7,5 s
Min10,2 s · Kia Sportage 1.6 T-GDi 150 FWD
Max5,7 s · Audi Q3 Sportback

Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)

Cross-energy alternatives

Same needs, different powertrain.

Model family

The full Audi Q3 F3 range

Generation F3 launched in 2018. Available versions sorted by energy.

Other versions of the F3

Compare

Popular duels involving the Q3 Sportback

Take the next step

Find a Q3 Sportback or value yours

Caralogy receives no commission on these external links.

Frequently asked questions

Audi Q3 Sportback: what you need to know

Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.

Where does the Q3 Sportback rank in its segment?#

Among the 11 C-SUV 2024–2028, the Q3 Sportback ranks 6th of 11 in Combined consumption (6.8 L/100, behind the Bmw X1 sDrive20d), 4th of 11 in Tank range (853 km, behind the Audi Q3 Sportback), 5th of 11 in 0–100 km/h (7.5 s, behind the Audi Q3 Sportback).

What is the range of the Q3 Sportback?#

853 km on a full tank (6.8 L/100 on the combined cycle) — 4th of 11 in autonomie du segment.

How much does the Q3 Sportback cost to run?#

Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.

Why not a Bmw X1 sDrive20d instead?#

The Bmw X1 sDrive20d leads in Combined consumption (5.1 L/100 vs 6.8 L/100). The choice depends on your priorities: check the Q3 Sportback vs Bmw X1 sDrive20d duel for a detailed comparison.

How does Caralogy calculate its figures?#

Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.