Over 0–100 km/h, Q5 SUV wins (5,00 s vs 6,86 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| Q5 SUV | iX3 G08 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 5,00 s−1,86 s | 6,86 s |
| 400 m standing start | 13,38 s−1,70 s | 15,08 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 24,55 s−2,99 s | 27,54 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 250 km/h+70 km/h | 180 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 5,91 kg/hpbetter ratio | 7,64 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | Q5 SUV | iX3 G08 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,19 s | 1,89 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,00 s | 3,16 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 3,57 s | 5,13 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 5,00 s | 6,86 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 6,88 s | 9,11 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 12,14 s | 16,42 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 20,28 s | - |
| 400 m standing start | 13,38 s | 15,08 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 24,55 s | 27,54 s |
| Top speed limited | 250 km/h | 180 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 367 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 500 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 170 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | 7-speed S tronic |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 286 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 400 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 185 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | - | |
| Gearbox | Automatic transmission, single-speed with fixed ratio |
Off the line, the Q5 SUV hits 100 km/h in 5.00 s versus 6.86 s for the Bmw iX3. At this point, the Q5 SUV leads by 1.86 s and sits roughly 24 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Q5 SUV is doing 136 km/h against 126 km/h for the Bmw iX3. The gap is 1.31 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the Q5 SUV crosses the line in 13.38 s versus 15.07 s. The 1.70 s gap represents roughly 71 m of track - a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the Q5 SUV continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 188 km/h versus 172 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Q5 SUV finishes in 24.54 s versus 27.54 s, with a 2.99 s lead.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the Q5 SUV is capped at 250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) km/h, the Bmw iX3 at 180 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
With two plug-in hybrid powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (5.91 kg/hp vs 7.64 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 10.53 seconds. The 1.86 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Over 0–100 km/h, Q5 SUV wins (5,00 s vs 6,86 s).
Q5 SUV goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 5,00 seconds (calibrated simulation).
Q5 SUV: 367 hp, ratio 5,91 kg/hp. iX3 G08: 286 hp, ratio 7,64 kg/hp.
Q5 SUV: 250 km/h. iX3 G08: 180 km/h.